The basic results:

Ultra-processed foods: .55 Euro/100 kcal
Minimally processed foods: 1.29 Euro/100 kcal

Their conclusion:
"Policies that improve relative affordability and accessibility of MPF are recommended."

But wait ...
Under Results:

"There were no significant differences between men and women and between different socio-economic population groups in regard to UPF consumption."
The authors also look at education:

"The contribution of MPF to the daily dietary cost was significantly higher for individuals with a higher household education level compared to those with a lower household education level (p < 0.01)."

Let& #39;s look at the actual numbers ...
Here& #39;s % of calories from minimally processed foods, by education level:

Low: 20%
Medium: 21%
High: 23%

Key question: what& #39;s the difference in consumption of ultra-processed foods? None. (31%/30%/31% for L/M/H)
It seems to me that the takeaway of this study is that diets are remarkably consistent across socio-economic categories.

The conclusion that we should make minimally processed foods more affordable is not supported by the data.

I would love to hear the authors& #39; take on this.
If lack of money were the barrier to eating well, diets would improve with income. They do not.

Yet even a study that demonstrates that they do not recommends making good food cheaper.

That& #39;s how entrenched this wrong idea is.

Thanks for listening. #B19-nutrients-12-02787">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/9/2787/htm #B19-nutrients-12-02787">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643...
You can follow @TamarHaspel.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: