Read on Twitter
As someone who does a great deal of research on Covid. I will post a series of scientific journals and articles on the other side of the science. Of which there is plenty. That’s why they didn’t take questions. It’s harder to justify the upcoming lockdown with balance
See thread
See thread
First: the most obvious flaw. Testing.
Many studies have shown the flaws in PCR testing with a cycle rate as high as we use. See article below from the NYT for an overview of PCR testing https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
Many studies have shown the flaws in PCR testing with a cycle rate as high as we use. See article below from the NYT for an overview of PCR testing https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
From the study
In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.
In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.
On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323671/
On cycles, no live Virus was found on cycle rates over 30.
Widespread agreement that cycle rate should be taken down to below 30. Only dead virus debris is found at higher cycle rates
On cycles, no live Virus was found on cycle rates over 30.
Widespread agreement that cycle rate should be taken down to below 30. Only dead virus debris is found at higher cycle rates
So while no live virus is found above 30. The NYT study finding 45 cycles to have a false positive rate of 90%.
The U.K’s testing cycle rate is 46.
Meaning as low as 10% of people who test positive have the live virus
https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/guidance-and-sop-covid-19-virus-testing-in-nhs-laboratories-v1.pdf
The U.K’s testing cycle rate is 46.
Meaning as low as 10% of people who test positive have the live virus
https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/guidance-and-sop-covid-19-virus-testing-in-nhs-laboratories-v1.pdf
A great twitter thread for Testing.
It is the biggest gaping hole. Even at 50k cases per day (which would never happen), using a cycle rate of 46 may mean just 5k have the virus.
https://twitter.com/abirballan/status/1303924976932794368?s=21 https://twitter.com/abirballan/status/1303924976932794368
It is the biggest gaping hole. Even at 50k cases per day (which would never happen), using a cycle rate of 46 may mean just 5k have the virus.
https://twitter.com/abirballan/status/1303924976932794368?s=21 https://twitter.com/abirballan/status/1303924976932794368
Based on this alone. The press conference is meaningless. The underlying narrative is false.
But anyway, let’s move on to another flaw.
T cells, which he didn’t cover. He mentioned antibody tests at 6% (we’ll get to that).
But anyway, let’s move on to another flaw.
T cells, which he didn’t cover. He mentioned antibody tests at 6% (we’ll get to that).
A review was out just last week into the growing evidence of T cell’s in people with no contact with the virus.
Several studies have pitched this as between 20-50% of the population https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563
Several studies have pitched this as between 20-50% of the population https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563
This German study found 81% of blood serum before the onset of the pandemic contained the T-Cell to fight the virus.
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-35331/v1
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-35331/v1
On to immunity.
HIT expected to be 20-30% in Britain.
Factoring in the T-cell data and the immunity estimates (even if as low as 6%, which I can’t believe), most areas in Britain will be past HIT https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160762v1
HIT expected to be 20-30% in Britain.
Factoring in the T-cell data and the immunity estimates (even if as low as 6%, which I can’t believe), most areas in Britain will be past HIT https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160762v1
Now onto non-pharmaceutical interventions. Masks, lockdowns etc..
A study analysed 46 countries and all the US states and found no correlation between non pharmaceutical intervention and deaths. https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-and-mask-mandates-do-not-lead-to-reduced-covid-transmission-rates-or-deaths-new-study-suggests/
A study analysed 46 countries and all the US states and found no correlation between non pharmaceutical intervention and deaths. https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-and-mask-mandates-do-not-lead-to-reduced-covid-transmission-rates-or-deaths-new-study-suggests/
Another study showing interventions don’t stop deaths. The same pattern has happened in every country and state
https://www.nber.org/papers/w27719.pdf
https://www.nber.org/papers/w27719.pdf
Sorry, forgot a a study about retention of antibodies. 91% of those inflected in Iceland retained antibodies. And importantly, 44% of people had antibodies without knowing exposure to the virus. Which is why antibody rate will be over 6% in Britain https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2026116
The virus has mutated. This is what virus’ do. The evidence on this is in. Here is a study https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343797723_Emerging_of_a_SARS-CoV-2_viral_strain_with_a_deletion_in_nsp1
When UTRI’s mutate they become more transmissible and less potent. I learned that in my first year of uni Exercise Health and Disease module
I almost fell off my chair when they mentioned excess deaths from non Covid.
Like missed cancer screenings, estimated to cause 35k-50k excess cancer deaths
Afraid that’s on you. Not us! https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/health-53300784
Like missed cancer screenings, estimated to cause 35k-50k excess cancer deaths
Afraid that’s on you. Not us! https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/health-53300784
Considering a lot of excess cancer deaths will be under life expectancy age. Whereas Covid? Same as normal life expectancy. 82 https://www.dailyheraldtribune.com/news/world/average-age-of-covid-victims-older-in-scotland-than-life-expectancy/wcm/3e0ab2ae-75f8-4641-9c66-1a8f08148831
In Canada the average Covid death is 85. 3 years more than life expectancy
http://www.bccdc.ca/Health-Info-Site/Documents/BC_Surveillance_Summary_Aug_20_2020.pdf
http://www.bccdc.ca/Health-Info-Site/Documents/BC_Surveillance_Summary_Aug_20_2020.pdf
And finally, this isn’t about saving lives. The economic cost of Covid has already surpassed the Covid death count. By some way.
Estimated years lost to Covid so far: 800,000
Indirect results of Covid: 1.5 million https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/499394-the-covid-19-shutdown-will-cost-americans-millions-of-years-of-life
Estimated years lost to Covid so far: 800,000
Indirect results of Covid: 1.5 million https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/499394-the-covid-19-shutdown-will-cost-americans-millions-of-years-of-life
