I have submitted an application for a GRC.

This was a very tough decision because I have massive issues with them but I feel the need to defferntiate mysekf as a transsexual from the modern ideology.

I feel now informed to comment on the so called dehumanising process.

1/?

I found the paperwork thorough but straightforward. Any transsexual that has gone through a gatekept process woukd have no issue producing the evidence.

I required multiple medical reports, proof of surgery, proof of hormones, proof of identity.

2/?

I also needed a formal diagnosis from an NHS approved gender expert which I had.

It is quite obvious that this process was design for those who went through a certain process. If you didn't you would have no chance.

I was required to sign an oath at a Notary Public.

3/?

If a GRC process is to be used and remain I actually felt it could be strengthened in some ways. I saw nothing that I felt should be dropped.

Often you see trans online state that they must use womens spaces as a requirement if a GRC. WRONG.

4/?

Last week someone stated that they were turned down for a GRC because they still present as male to their elderly mother. WRONG.

No part of the paperwork requires me to use womens spaces. Nor does it require "stealth". Nor does it need me to deny biology.

5/?

I am glad to have gone through the process to see it firsthand.
I have to wait now 3 to 6 months for it to go before the panel but all the requirement checks are confirmed complete.

The GRC application was quite obviously written for post op transsexuals and I had no issue.

6/?