Don't call it court-packing. Call it court-updating. We've had 9 justices since the US was sparsely populated.

And do it in a way that doesn't spark an arms race: Example, Biden adds a few seats, then two seats added every 4 years until no single justice has too much power.
Okay, yeah, I'm assuming Biden will win. I'm also assuming McConnell will ram another justice through.
Others are so much better at marketing than I am 😉 https://twitter.com/JoeRhile/status/1307464353134923779
That requires a Constitutional amendment, so it's much harder. https://twitter.com/artsycarol/status/1307465623161667590
On the other hand, the Constitution does not specify the number of justices.
The idea was for judges to be able to do what was right without worrying about reelection. It was supposed to put the court above politics.

At times it has actually worked. Desegregation would have ben harder if federal judges had to answer to voters. https://twitter.com/kpcruz/status/1307468335005741059
Good idea. If only I could go back and tell Hamilton a few things.

Like dude, you had some real good ideas, but the electoral college was not one of them. https://twitter.com/Wilder_Advance/status/1307471845906620416
https://twitter.com/InquisitiveUrsa/status/1307533617845936132
Here's why it's better: With an entire branch of government divided only 9 ways, each justice has way too much power, particularly because they have lifetime appointments.

A larger court means that not every justice hears every case. Panels would form.
Precisely. https://twitter.com/lukewyman1/status/1307545677124124673
You can follow @Teri_Kanefield.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: