Read on Twitter
I would like to point out an inconsistency.
Wet& #39;suwet& #39;en
People in their land
Resource extraction proposed
Protest by IndigenousPeople
Injunction against Indigenous People
Arrests of Indigenous People
Wet& #39;suwet& #39;en
People in their land
Resource extraction proposed
Protest by IndigenousPeople
Injunction against Indigenous People
Arrests of Indigenous People
Haudensaunee on their land
Resource use proposed
Protest by Indigenous
Injunction against Indigenous People
Arrests of Indigenous People
Resource use proposed
Protest by Indigenous
Injunction against Indigenous People
Arrests of Indigenous People
Mi& #39;kmaq on their own territory
Resource use
Protest by white people
No injunction against the white people
Arrests for assault (2)
Resource use
Protest by white people
No injunction against the white people
Arrests for assault (2)
Since Canada& #39;s own court upheld the Mi& #39;kmaq right to fish as stated in the 1701 Halifax treaty, why are the local politicians not selling an injunction to stop their citizens from breaking the law?
Perhaps the Minister of DFO respecting the SCC Marshall decision, should apply for an injunction against those Canadian fishermen breaking the law.
Here is a starting point using a compilation of vessels, registry information and owners as reported by eye witnesses to the Canadians breaking Canadian law
