NOPE

Try again

Incorrect Argument on Form and Substance

See the following logical *fallacies*:
*Straw Man~ Conservative vs.
[ (“Feminist” ) does not =
{ (“Liberal”) *Red Herring*}]

And UR Description of the “Studies” = *Begging the Question https://twitter.com/thatssupercold/status/1306109551419166721">https://twitter.com/thatssupe...

But please send ONE link to ONE of the aforementioned studies so I may Review

Without a factual, verifiable source I’m forced to just “take your word” and while the possibility of it being 100% correct exists..
The DOI is ONLY concerned with SELF EVIDENT TRUTHs

Otherwise, you’re really just fully engaged in your own Onanism

Which is cool and I get it... But don’t ask me to Join because:

A) it would, by definition, become something else entirely

B) Kind of an odd request (or even suggest) to someone in your first conversation, No?

Okay this is really just gonna come off as nit picking, but I cannot be unsilent on this

For something to be logical it should be intuitive, likely, more probable than not to an objective 3rd party, or the conclusion/inference should follow

So.. If you want to convince someone else of your point.. START with Something that everyone can agree is reasonably true.
List other supporting facts in a descending order proportionate to their perceived truthyness AND end with the Conclusion-