A several years when I first arrived at @MaynoothUni I taught a course called, simply 'Affect.' A third year seminar focus on the then cutting edge and trendy topic. I tried to design a syllabus that would affect students: /1

One year, I was unable to be present for the first lecture, so instead, I programmed an avatar at XtraNormal to give my presentation for me. It seemed especially appropriate (and funny) to elicit the uncanny valley at the start of this module /2

Video continues here /3

And then finishes here /4

I taught #Affect because my work in PNG had made me think about sorrow, a theme in much New Guinea ethnography (see Edward Schieffelin's legendary book The Sorrow of the Lonely and the Burning of the Dancers)... /5

But what concerned me most wasn't sorrow, but rather melancholia: grief denied. /6

When I engage a subject in research, I teach myself about it through the teaching I offer students. /7

This is the most exciting and special kind of teaching: where each seminar is an opportunity for real discovery. /8

I learn so much from my students. /9

After years of teaching 'Affect,' I came to see the set of analyses associated with the term as anthropologically problematic. /10

And the nature of my concern lies in what William Mazarella called the 'dream of immediation' present in much affect theory: it's race away from representation understood as meaning. /11

Mazarella's excellent and provocative piece can be found here. /12 https://www.academia.edu/366261/Affect_What_is_it_Good_For

But he joins a chorus of voices critiquing what Ruth Leys called 'the turn to affect': https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/659353?socuuid=4ecdc40b-0f96-4cbc-bfbf-1134e6612823&socplat=twitter /13

For my money, Leys demolishes 'affect theory.' /14

Anyway, this thread, telegraphing academic positions of enormous complexity and erudition, was just really an excuse to post the video from XtraNormal. /15

Remember the notion of machinima? /16