On the Sterlite case, this guy says to a Oregon (USA) NonProfit:
"Thank U for the technical critiques, expert opinions, analysis & presentation of Intl best practices & Legal Memos on various aspects of case law relating to closure of polluting units" 1/n
https://archive.is/w9bGo ">https://archive.is/w9bGo&quo... https://twitter.com/NarenMenon1/status/1305855335035527169">https://twitter.com/NarenMeno...

+"Please know how much your contributions over more than 10 years have helped people here!"
https://archive.is/jRx8D 
And,">https://archive.is/jRx8D&quo... I agree with him @NarenMenon1 ettan; how can someone with Electronics Engg degree with a PG in Journalism #lulz prepare the briefs on copper smelter? Or, +

+on atmospheric chemistry? As he himself acknowledges, the briefs were prepared by tech guys sitting half the globe away. Not just in the present case, but always. Around 3-4 years ago, I outed on TL, his FCRA sources. I still recall how much I was struggling to find it earlier.+

+that it was a Eureka moment for me. The same was confirmed pucca by the 2018-19 FC4 signatory. Nothing happens. btw, as you know, I blame the TN Govt. on the plant closure more than GoI, but the topic here is FCRA & the judgement. Would the verdict have been different, had +

+people who decide on such things knew a priori that the tech inputs & & #39;legal memos& #39; (not my word btw, but his) were prepared by non-citizens of India? I don& #39;t know. I doubt it. But one thing is for sure @NarenMenon1 We ought to define NatSec stricter & call nonsense as what it+

+is, as Nonsense, political correctness can go to hell.