Read on Twitter
India has too many apologists of Islamic invasion of india. They say Sanghis r lying, creating social unrest, "saffronising" history. Since these ppl swear by Dr. Ambedkar, I assumed they'd trust him.A snapshot of the islamic rule of India from "Pakistan or Partition of India":
For those who say "All kings invaded n fought, Muslim invasion was just territorial". No, it wasn't. Islamic invasion of India was a civilizational invasion, solely for destroying the ugly civilization of kafirs n establish Islam in its place.
A snapshot of earlier Invaders ranging from Ghazni to Qubt-ud-Din (who also made the abomination Qutub Minar- victory over the kafirs)
They did everything ranging from destruction of temples, plunder and loot of its reserves, to forceful conversion, enslavement of millions, rapes, and genocides of magnanimous scales.
The first plunder of Somnath temple as quoted by Dr. Ambedkar.
Imposition of Jizya, so severe hindus were practically robbed of everything. And a chilling confession that all of this was actually benevolent. In Hanifa school, jizya was permitted. But in all others, it was just "Islam or Death"
And India survived all this. Mind u, this is just a glossed over summary, a tiny snapshot in around 2-3 pages of the book. If we go deeper, each story would be more horrid than the other. The Islamic rule of India was one of the worst, if not, the worst genocide in human history
N what do our ancestors get in return? "All kings did that" "It was just a territorial invasion" "It wasn't so bad" "Mughals r part of Indian heritage". SHAME!!!!!
Everyone who bears a Hindu (Hindu, jain, Buddhist, Sikh, parsi, Jew, Christian) name today must be proud n grateful. It is this unyielding civilization which is the reason why u still exist in a secular democracy. Any other civilization would hv goven up a long time ago.
