Read on Twitter
"Definitions were changed and data ‘cooked'" - 10/27/2016
The CDC is being influenced by corporate and political interests https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/301432-the-cdc-is-being-being-influenced-by-corporate-and-political
The CDC is being influenced by corporate and political interests https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/301432-the-cdc-is-being-being-influenced-by-corporate-and-political
The CDC is a collection of people. That is all. https://twitter.com/drdannielle/status/1305641214205661191
Why did it take the CDC 3 months to start separating out deaths from Covid from deaths from flu & pneumonia? https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1256577527662903298?s=21
How is it objective and authoritative to inflate the death numbers?
Is it important to the CDC that nursing homes account for 4 in 10 Covid deaths? https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2020/06/16/nursing-homes-account-for-over-40-of-us-coronavirus-deaths/
Is it important to the CDC that the known widely effective drug hydrochloroquine was restricted by various means, including pharmacy boards and social pressure against it - no doubt pushing up the death count?
What month and year did the "resistance account" Alternative CDC open up on Twitter? January 2017?
How about "Alternative HHS," comprised of "angry/concerned scientists"? Also when @POTUS was inaugurated?
2/9/2017 on Twitter I attacked the "alt" Federal accounts for being seditious. Look at these wild responses. "He is an enemy of the state," they said.
Here's more.
I don't have the original Tweet. I wiped my Twitter account at some point when I first started writing about Pizzagate.
I do remember counting 127 alt Gov accounts. That means a government wide revolt.
@JamesOKeefeIII @Project_Veritas documented this. https://www.projectveritas.com/news/breaking-deep-state-unmasked-u-s-gao-employee-admits-i-break-rules-every-day/
@JamesOKeefeIII @Project_Veritas documented this. https://www.projectveritas.com/news/breaking-deep-state-unmasked-u-s-gao-employee-admits-i-break-rules-every-day/
The Washington Post itself reported on the impeachment effort which started on day 1.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/2017/live-updates/politics/live-coverage-of-trumps-inauguration/the-campaign-to-impeach-president-trump-has-begun/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/2017/live-updates/politics/live-coverage-of-trumps-inauguration/the-campaign-to-impeach-president-trump-has-begun/
The CDC has been embroiled in resisting the Administration from the get go. They aren't objective at all. Remember the "7 banned words"? Those are VALUE LADEN. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-gets-list-of-forbidden-words-fetus-transgender-diversity/2017/12/15/f503837a-e1cf-11e7-89e8-edec16379010_story.html
In fact, the CDC goes fully against science by embracing "critical race theory" -- which defines reality as a social construct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_race_theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_race_theory
Further, if the CDC is openly ignoring the President's call to stop using critical race theory at work (for training), doesn't it go without saying that they'll ignore and attack him on their core mission? https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-moving-ahead-critical-race-204124722.html
The politicized CDC -- under the guise of "help" -- ignores the distinction between what they're supposed to be doing (medical science best) and what they're not (public health policy). Outside their swim lane. https://reason.com/2020/09/14/federal-court-rules-pennsylvanias-lockdown-order-unconstitutional/
Under Obama, government scientists were really muzzled: "Obama Science Policy Legitimizes 'Minders,' PIO Interview Permissions,"
January 12, 2011 https://www.sej.org/publications/government/obama-science-policy-legitimizes-minders-pio-interview-permissions
January 12, 2011 https://www.sej.org/publications/government/obama-science-policy-legitimizes-minders-pio-interview-permissions
"A White House science policy issued December 17, 2010, allows agencies to require press office permission before a journalist can talk to a scientist and to require Saddam-style 'minders' to supervise the scientist while s/he is giving an interview."
I do recall Obama appointees at multiple agencies reviewing work products before they went out to the public, at USAID and NIST.
I remember one time that this caused a clash between an appointee and a civil servant. This is not an unusual phenomenon, either; each side always thinks it knows best.
Politico knows this and we all know the CDC is anti Trump and his the data on Covid stand-alone morbidity. So it's unfair and distorted to attack a Trump appointee for doing his job. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/11/exclusive-trump-officials-interfered-with-cdc-reports-on-covid-19-412809
Further, initiatives/accords/agreements make great slush funds
Right, Joe? https://twitter.com/joebiden/status/1305608509229207552
Right, Joe? https://twitter.com/joebiden/status/1305608509229207552
In the end, the CDC cannot have it both ways.
They can't say on the one hand that science is independent, and on the other that it is basically a social production, like every other element of reality.
A VERY strange position for scientists to take.
They can't say on the one hand that science is independent, and on the other that it is basically a social production, like every other element of reality.
A VERY strange position for scientists to take.
What does the CDC say about God?
An unborn child is not a "fetus."
It is life.
It is life.
@threadreaderapp unroll
@threader_app compile
