(1/6) the thing is the way you talk about these sensitive issues is not in a theoretical manner (which may i remind you this is still a theory by definition). this not only damages the validity of actual closeting cases within industry (there by proving u don’t really care about- https://twitter.com/billiejeans28/status/1305638799184101377

(2/6) these issues but only using them to further ur theory) but it totally ignores the premise of a debate (which we are having). in addition to this you are assuming things that have never been confrimed despite “proof” and worst of all bringing a child into it. which is-

(3/6) beyond disgusting you have no right to be so invasive and ruin this child’s life. you can throw all the “proof” around you want, it doesn’t change the fact that this is wrong on all levels, the child is not alive to fit ur narrative.

(4/6) also the thread covers the alternative viewpoint- of if the theory was “real” and the moral issues surrounding that, your reply just confirmed to me that you didn’t read the whole thing after all.

(5/6)-
the thread covers the perspective of if the theory was “real”, it retaliates that there is no benefit of your posts if it was “real”, no change would arise. however on the flip side if the theory was wrong (which it is) then you are doing so much damage to-

(6/6) this child which is inconsiderate and plain harassment in the eyes of morality. once again there is probably nothing that’s going to convince you, ur too far gone at this point, just always remember your actions have consequences.

it wouldn’t let me post this in the replies so i had to quote tweet it. so sorry to everyone on the tl.