1/12 THREAD on ECT:

ECT has been demonized for decades (thanks Miloš Forman) despite it being one of the most rapidly effective interventions in all of psychiatry, often when previous interventions are not possible or have failed.
2/12 Yes, ECT is a serious intervention requiring anesthetic support and medical monitoring. Memory loss is a common side effect and is sometimes long lasting.

But that must be balanced against the life-threatening nature of persistent severe depression and catatonia.
3/12 Some object to the basic premise of "electrocuting" the brain, but don't question the routine life-saving practice of electrical "shock" for cardiac resuscitation.
7/12 Still, if taken at face value, that APD brain volume loss = brain damage, then guess what ECT studies show?

An *increase* in fronto-limbic brain volume!

So that means ECT promotes "brain growth," right?
12/12

And so, we can all agree that more/better ECT research needs to be done.

But the evidence indicates that the benefit for refractory depression & catatonia where few other options exist outweighs risk of serious adverse events. And evidence for "brain damage" is lacking.
You can follow @psychunseen.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: