Do #qualitative interviews cause #distress when used for sensitive topics and/or in sensitive populations?
A thread (& case study with #cancer #survivors).
1/5
A thread (& case study with #cancer #survivors).
1/5
2/5 #Qualitative research is ideally suited to gain rich insights into human experience, including those with medical conditions and at-risk groups.
But, one #barrier to conducting #Qualitative interviews is concern (often from physicians or IRB/ethics) of causing #distress
But, one #barrier to conducting #Qualitative interviews is concern (often from physicians or IRB/ethics) of causing #distress
3/5 Yet, data on distress around #qualitative #interviews with medical pops is lacking.
In our new #PsychoOncologypaper, #AYA #cancersurvivors completed a validated distress screening tool before, after & 1 week after an interview on #fearofrecurrence
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pon.5544
In our new #PsychoOncologypaper, #AYA #cancersurvivors completed a validated distress screening tool before, after & 1 week after an interview on #fearofrecurrence
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pon.5544
4/5 We found:
Ave. distress levels were low at all timepoints
Mean distress was highest before the interview (anticipatory anxiety?)
One p't had a distress peak after the interview, but quickly resolved
Given variability, distress screening protocols may be useful
Ave. distress levels were low at all timepoints
Mean distress was highest before the interview (anticipatory anxiety?)
One p't had a distress peak after the interview, but quickly resolved
Given variability, distress screening protocols may be useful
5/5 In sum, we found little evidence that #qualitative interviews on a sensitive topic ( #fearofrecurrence) and in a sensitive population (young #cancersurvivors) cause lasting distress.
Anecdotally, p'ts reported interview as #cathartic & a chance to reflect on a life experience
Anecdotally, p'ts reported interview as #cathartic & a chance to reflect on a life experience