Read on Twitter
if something doesn& #39;t make sense,
well,
it doesn& #39;t make any sense in your head/worldview.
not in reality.
well,
it doesn& #39;t make any sense in your head/worldview.
not in reality.
if someone tells you that something is wrong with the world.
its comfort of limited sadistic mind.
world is exactly as it should be.
its comfort of limited sadistic mind.
world is exactly as it should be.
There always remains "why".
For comforting ourselves we can choose to ignore infinite regress or incompleteness of Socratic kind inquiry.
I don& #39;t know how I will find THAT in this existence.
What is "THAT"?
We often value "truth"?
We feel there is something ULTIMATE in it ..
For comforting ourselves we can choose to ignore infinite regress or incompleteness of Socratic kind inquiry.
I don& #39;t know how I will find THAT in this existence.
What is "THAT"?
We often value "truth"?
We feel there is something ULTIMATE in it ..
Yet, what is "truth"?
What is "is"?
What is solution to scepticism to temporal inquiries? Solution to problem of reductionism (e.g. trying to develop a worldview to look at things through some set of axioms) or complex things that emerges due to interaction of small components?
What is "is"?
What is solution to scepticism to temporal inquiries? Solution to problem of reductionism (e.g. trying to develop a worldview to look at things through some set of axioms) or complex things that emerges due to interaction of small components?
There is always problem of data set inherent in men& #39;s cognition or mind etc.
Do mind makes man particular insted of universal?
Is sense of ego just this particularity or set of preference?
e.g. whole of your identity differs from someone because of just decisions you make?
Do mind makes man particular insted of universal?
Is sense of ego just this particularity or set of preference?
e.g. whole of your identity differs from someone because of just decisions you make?
if concept of some essence that stays alive after physical death holds true,
Then how at some point in time this essence acquired this particularity?
e.g. problem of karma, is is just man made stuff to comfort the discomfort that emerges after realising inequality?
Then how at some point in time this essence acquired this particularity?
e.g. problem of karma, is is just man made stuff to comfort the discomfort that emerges after realising inequality?
e.g. if you like some flavor of ice cream and someone else doesn& #39;t, is that whole that comprises you?
e.g. do your particular choices is what makes you, "you"?
If that& #39;s so psyche is just decisions making algorithms, albeit very complex?
e.g. do your particular choices is what makes you, "you"?
If that& #39;s so psyche is just decisions making algorithms, albeit very complex?
Earlier in this thread we looked into problem of data set,
What I meant here is, that if men does think purely from synthetic experience and makes sense of it,
Most likely, he is always going to miss something.
In this case his thinking will be also impacted by order of event.
What I meant here is, that if men does think purely from synthetic experience and makes sense of it,
Most likely, he is always going to miss something.
In this case his thinking will be also impacted by order of event.
e.g. his sense of causality and correlation/synchronicity of events and such stuff.
Your thinking about world (WORLDVIEW) is very tightly created unconsciously or consciously by things you have experienced, the lexicon based limitations.
Your thinking about world (WORLDVIEW) is very tightly created unconsciously or consciously by things you have experienced, the lexicon based limitations.
As men grows more and more,
The feeling of something that lies inside but not finding its expression,
Gets reduced too.
There is problem with logic too.
The feeling of something that lies inside but not finding its expression,
Gets reduced too.
There is problem with logic too.
If world emerges through men the logic might go far, (idealism/mentalism)
Buy if reverse is the case (materialism),
Then logic will fall apart sooner.
Here, Buddhism take stance as "interdependent emergence".
Buy if reverse is the case (materialism),
Then logic will fall apart sooner.
Here, Buddhism take stance as "interdependent emergence".
e.g. world and man both arises in manner of not from one to another but they both arise from one another.
How this knot ∞ comes?
Well, I don& #39;t know.
So, in ideal sense there is no causality.
Everything there is to done or which can be accomplished is, already done.
How this knot ∞ comes?
Well, I don& #39;t know.
So, in ideal sense there is no causality.
Everything there is to done or which can be accomplished is, already done.