Weird, they accidentally published an internal memo pointing out this is a bad story right in the middle of the story, followed by the weird unpersuasive memo arguing to at least keep the story on hold in case it turns out to matter later on
Three bylines and 35 paragraphs on "potential conflicts that could draw scrutiny" https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/08/us/politics/doug-emhoff-kamala-harris-law.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/0...
The Times politics desk is up there with the electoral college on the list of institutions that made 2016 possible and are structurally incapable of not doing the same things again