this is a really good take.
If you completely and ignore cisheterosexism as an axis of power. And that& #39;s where the divide lies. Those who understand that heterosexuals are a powerful class of people and thus women who are heterosexuals occupy a dominant class of people https://twitter.com/juiciestofjays/status/1303232040276557824">https://twitter.com/juiciesto...
If you completely and ignore cisheterosexism as an axis of power. And that& #39;s where the divide lies. Those who understand that heterosexuals are a powerful class of people and thus women who are heterosexuals occupy a dominant class of people https://twitter.com/juiciestofjays/status/1303232040276557824">https://twitter.com/juiciesto...
I& #39;m going to continue to make good faith attempts to engage
This is not a binary woman versus man issue
it is a multidimensional cis hetero woman vs. cis Gay man issue which implicates cisheteronormativity in general
This is not a binary woman versus man issue
it is a multidimensional cis hetero woman vs. cis Gay man issue which implicates cisheteronormativity in general
Besides, people who present marriage to gay men as "endangering women" are revealing hidden biases and contempt for gay men.
Marriage to men is dangerous, marriage to men who are gay is not *more* dangerous, so what is this coded "endangering women" talk
Marriage to men is dangerous, marriage to men who are gay is not *more* dangerous, so what is this coded "endangering women" talk
Ultimately one side is just unable to see themselves as oppressors
that side is cishet women, and so the analysis that we use to come to a conclusion structurally based on power is just not there
Because they believe that women are perpetual victims
that side is cishet women, and so the analysis that we use to come to a conclusion structurally based on power is just not there
Because they believe that women are perpetual victims