I guess rather than just dunk on this Netflix ad, which isn& #39;t very nice, I& #39;ll try to be constructive here and critique it. /1
First, the idea--"more than just a line"--makes the brand feel small. If any brand "owns" the video progress bar, it& #39;s probably YouTube. But in any case, tying their brand to a generic UX feature reduces them to a streaming service. They& #39;re much bigger than that. /2
And in a way, it& #39;s the opposite of what HBO did with that great tagline, "It& #39;s not TV. It& #39;s HBO." It depositioned the rest of the category. "TV" felt almost disparaging. Genius. /3
You can& #39;t build a great ad on a flawed idea, but the copy is also lacking. That first line--oy. It& #39;s just patting yourself on the back. Why not start with a human truth? The word "very" is a surrender to laziness. And please don& #39;t use the "special" unless you& #39;re being ironic. /4
And why & #39;gets& #39; in, "It gets you to see other people& #39;s worlds"?

Do you mean allows? Invites?

It& #39;s not a great thought in any case, but "gets"? /5
It& #39;s also best to avoid cliches ("takes you on a journey") and invisible words like "incredible." /6
But finally, on very last line: where does "We& #39;re only one story away" mean and what does that have to do with the headline? It feels like a new thought. /7
I appreciate the fact that they wanted to make a bold statement about the brand--in a full-page NYT ad, no less. But this isn& #39;t it. I would& #39;ve capitalized on that record Emmy haul and fired a shot right across the bow of HBO. /8
Just look at what MGM did way back in 1943. This was a publicity photo of all the actors they had under contract. It& #39;s a veritable Who& #39;s Who of some of the greatest entertainers of all time. You don& #39;t have to say too much when you& #39;ve got the goods, and Netflix has them. /fin
You can follow @janthonylong.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: