Those who think that Chinese will give credence to a country dealing from a weak hesitant position and attitude, think wrong. This is real politik. Military firmness will strengthen the Government’s hand in taxkling this situation.
Too many military leaders are of the school https://twitter.com/sushantsin/status/1302619172795375616

That the Chinese and its PLA can be managed. They could not be more wrong. You will keep giving and he will keep taking. Requirement is not ‘managers’ but leaders of the Sagat-Hanut school, who will bite the bullet if required backed up by their strong intellect and will.

A commanders will transcends the battlefd and his command. It’s quite akin to the connect that a good rider has with his horse. Hesitation fear lack of conviction gets reflected all the way down.
Maybe sometime the ‘ones who decide ‘ will conclude that military leadership

Is larger than mere ACR points. 1962 we failed primarily on account of poor leadership in military political and bureaucratic domains.
While we can survive lapses in the latter two, failure in the military domain is catastrophic and immensely hurtful to the nation.

‘Managers’ ought to read the paper ‘Crises in Command‘ that General Hanut wrote as Brigadier whilst doing NDC.
Obviously the ‘managers’ don’t read good papers and exam how could they implement.

The chinaman comes knocking on our door. Stand firm. Don’t keel over to your fears