My thread:

Why @ArminNavabi is an aggressor not a Victim? Why his rationality as an athiest is another face of mosaic distinction of Abrahmism, which promote nothing but a sense of hegemony? 1/n

Question no 1:
Who insulted other first?
A: @ArminNavabi
- Makes him aggressor.

Now if he insulting Hindu goddess is FoE, then some young boys are trying to give him the taste of his own medicine are also practising their FoE. No one is doing violence here. 2/n

Question no.2
Why his rationality is nothing more than hegemony?
- Because he thinks his feeling of pain for insult of his mother have more value than feelings of Hindus for insult of their Gods.

What is his argument for reaching to this conclusion?
That Gods are imaginary 3/n

Here what his little or no existent brain fails to understand that it's the feeling which makes us Human not our belief.

If you think that inflicting pain on others is valid because you think someone else's belief are false. Then you are acknowledging that you don't 4/n

believe in co-existence. This tells about lack of Human values in you. As I said in my tweet to you earlier. Only difference is you & extremist IZlamists that they kill & you insult.

https://twitter.com/Newfangled_/status/1302345046528634880?s=19

5/n

Now let's come on rationality. Athiest says Gods doesn't exist as there is no proof it. But then let me ask me counter question, what is the proof they don't exist. Puzzle of universe is not entirely solved yet. There are many aspect where physical senses of human fail. 6/n

You are actually acknowledging things which ur 5 senses can detect or science tells us. But not long ago science maintained the belief that atom is smallest unit. Now via electron they hv reached to quark. So in evolving belief without research, athiesm is as invalid as theism7/n

So according to you if someone is colour blind & refuse to acknowledge the colour exists,he has authority to mock anyone believe in colour. When science is still curious to decode dark matter, athiests are already settle in existing belief & ready to mock alternative belief 8/n

But now let's counter you on your rationality only that mocking goddess & people mocking your mother are different. As former is Imaginary. First it mother is died now, she is Imaginary to world now. She exists in memories only like Hindu Gods exist in memory. 9/n

But does it hurt people due to physical nature of Gods or mother. No it hurts due to respect, love or faith exist of these entities our minds,But I want to ask what is the proof of his love for mother or pain he feel for her insult. Feelings doesn't exist in physical realm. 10/n

And if you acknowledge that then how it is different than Hindu feelings same for his God. Truth is your athiesm is descriminatory in nature which creates a threat for any different belief co-existing with you. Like mosaic distinction did to idolators or pagans. 11/n

So @ArminNavabi , you are not athiest but a religion phobic hegemonic mind. Who find pleasure in hurting feelings of Hindus or anybody.

"Stop taking moral high ground for your hypocrisy".

12/n

Read the quoted tweet to know the reason why Hindus r offended

Now you use those tweets to spread your Hinduphobia, talks alot about your revengeful nature. Their response can appear immature but it is reaction to your immaturity.

Their FoE = Ur FoE https://twitter.com/Newfangled_/status/1283472444968194051?s=19

Please read & share, if you find it shareable (no compulsion). It's an effort to not let that athiest take moral high ground based on morality perceived by modern world as he himself is culprit of it.

@doubtinggaurav @AgentSaffron @rahulroushan @brawling_virago