Read on Twitter
1/ “Epidemiologists’ advice is all that matters in fight on Covid & they all advocate for continued lockdowns; so we must stay the course”. Factually wrong. Experts are now split. So given its not unanimous, it’s time to pause, research & decide which experts make most sense.
2/ This thread contains some analysis and info pertaining to COVID-19, and our chosen response (of mass lockdown) in combatting this virus. In the interest of transparency, my view is that virus is real and it’s a relatively bad one. But mass lockdown approach is not answer.
3/ Just to be clear, I am not here to keep arguing, just hoping to make ppl consider some things they perhaps haven’t yet - when deciding where they ultimately stand in their support of and commitment to current approach.
4/ Close to home: Victorian deaths. Before I dive in, here is Brett Sutton in a presser about recording Covid deaths. Video at bottom of the link (very hard to find in mainstream stream tho 
?) https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/caldronpool.com/watch-victoria-says-coronavirus-death-toll-includes-people-who-did-not-die-from-the-virus/
?) https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/caldronpool.com/watch-victoria-says-coronavirus-death-toll-includes-people-who-did-not-die-from-the-virus/
5/ So to summarize, if someone dies with a Covid+ test result... they will be recorded in the Covid death tally we are presented each day. Bit of a simplistic approach but fine. HOWEVER if that’s the case... recorded deaths calls for some context no? Here is that context
6/ I note Sutton’s comments aren’t a once off. Dr. Birx said similar thing at a presser in US. Pic provides some background re a similar thing in UK. I.e. same relevant approach to Covid death recording is prelevant around world.(This is relevant for other points in my thread)
