I think some misunderstand the objections to James Cantor. (A psychologist who is somewhat critical of trans ideology and is also an advocate for the inclusion of pedophilia under the banner of LGBT and the legality of child sex dolls).

He posits that child sex dolls could possibly reduce sex offending. That is not only a baseless assertion it denies the evidence which clearly states that objectification leads to dehumanization. There is a strong possibility that these dolls could lead to a worsening of ...

deviant behaviour in men* who are obsessed with sexually assaulting children.

[**men obsessed with sexually assaulting children is a more accurate way to describe these men than the strange term pedophilia (pedo= child, filia = love/friendship).]

Yet Cantor is comfortable giving his 'expert' opinion in support of men importing child sex dolls from overseas. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/child-sex-doll-trial-1.3976228

This is in conflict with current child pornography laws. There is *real* pressure to loosen these restrictions and some reinterpretation has already happened that I find deeply concerning.

The Deprogrammer has an informative video critiquing the normalization of 'sex' robots. Her videos are difficult to watch but deserving of support as she is doing real intellectual work and she has been booted off numerous social media platforms.