THREAD; The 25 Rules of Disinformation.

In this thread, we will dive into how to diagnose, confront, and defeat disinformation, trolls and shills.

I want to give a HUGE shoutout to @ergonoatia and @11AngelAura11 for the help here. Give them a follow if you dont already.
(2) We suggest you bookmark this thread as an easy reference point. Let’s get started!!

*This* is how the Mockingbird Media operates. Many ask why they won’t report on human trafficking - this is why.

To keep the truth buried, they simply refuse to report on it.
(3) Here we have the “no, but!” crowd. The people who will get aggressive the moment you present them with a fact contrary to their fragile belief system.

This is a form of what is known as “sliding”.
(4) Rumor mongers! These are people who will pass off anything you say as a rumor. And it is remarkably easy to do given the media wont report on the truth you assert.

“4 Kevin Spacey accusers have wound up dead”.

“Oh, thats just a rumor!”

Again - easy peasy to hide truth
(5) The strawman. Most of us are aware of this, but here is an example. You begin highlighting POTUS’s accomplishments, and weve all heard it ... “he is rayciss!!”

And then youre made to present evidence of his being not racist while ignoring the initial debate altogether.
(6) Sidetracking. Weve all had this happen as well. ‘Member the first time you told someone Hanx was a p3d0 and they said “lulz youre a crazy conspiracy loon”.

Instead of addressing your claim, they immediately insult and deride in an attempt to anger you so their claim sticks.
(7) This one is pretty blunt and self explanatory. Yall know that asshole that attacks you, and then blocks you?

Yup. That is this. It is the equivalent of Vietcong sneak attacks.

It is what you do when you know you wont win an argument.
(8) Ahhh yes. The good ole’ hidden agenda ploy.

Example: “All BLM donations are going to the DNC”.

Retort: “Youre only saying that because youre racist and dont want advancement for minorities”.

This immediately puts you on the defensive and detracts from your argument.
(9) I call this “the facade”. This is the guy “who knows a guy”. His sources are “legit” and he just knows for a fact he is right. This tactic is sly and easy to miss. These folks have a big enough vocabulary to bullshit you into thinking theyre right. Manipulation is key, here.
(10) This one is easy.

Think “magic bullet theory”. You can poke holes in it alllllll day long, but people will still stick right to the hardline narrative.

You find this a lot in professional shills, or folks with severe cognitive dissonance.
(11) This one has a fairly recent and relevant example as well - Hillary’s emails.

You disclose enough to clear your charges while hiding the rest. Then when anything is dug back up, you just lump it in with the first batch and act as if they are one in the same.
(12) This one is clever af. You actually own up to wrong-doing - in the process you look like the good guy and any subsequent assertions are just a witch hunt.

Huh .. ya know what? The witch’s emails kinda fall under this one, too.
(13) “Enigmas have no solution”. This sounds familiar, huh? How many times have we all heard this movement cant be real because all of this is simply “too complicated”.

Or that JFK’s murder would have been “too complex” to pull off. It is a way of immediately deflecting.
(14) Backpeddling. Changing the facts as you work backwards through them.

Think of how often the story changes during a false flag. Vegas, for example. First reports were multiple shooters, until backwards reasoning and logic whittled it down to one shooter. (JFK, anyone?).
(15) So. Umm. 🍕G8️⃣ anyone? Here is the penultimate remark here: “well, if its true, prove it now! Where is the smoking gun??”. We all KNOW 🍕G8️⃣ is true, but this very attitude can, and does keep investigations from happening
(16) This isnt intentional - it is just that [they] have used these tactics for ages, but JFK and 9/11 are fantastic examples.

LHO didnt act alone, and Bin Laden had fuck all to do with 9/11, but [they] misdirected the facts to present those assertions as the answer for both
(17) Im just gonna leave this here …
(18) This is classic ”sliding”. Instead of addressing the complaint at hand - you flip to a brand new topic altogether.

You say Antifa are terrorists, and the reply would be “yeah, but Trump’s casino went bankrupt”.
(19) Basically - be a jackass. And then when you get called out, accuse them of being overly sensitive and obtuse.

Pretty much every word Pelosi has said to POTUS.

This one is infuriating, and exceptionally hard not to react to. But knowing the tactic helps defeat it.
(20) These next 3 also have VERY recent, and VERY relevant examples. So I am going to post them, and then the examples.
(21)
(22) Now did any of that sound familiar???

Russiagate. Flynn. Impeachment. Stormy Daniels. The Atlantic’s BS military story, HELL! EVEN COVID!!

Read those again, and than go and apply them to EVERY SINGLE ONE of the aforementioned situations, and many more!
(23) Make your bullshit the truth. That is pretty much what this says.

Think Warren Commision, or Masks. Things in which copious evidence exists to debunk the official story, but the official story has the backing of “science” and “experts”, and therefore must be true!!!
(24) I mean this is pretty obvious, right? Look back at how many times big stories are breaking, and we are handed distractions.

RIGHT NOW this is happening. Human trafficking should be the biggest story on earth, instead, we are forcefed a plandemic.
(25) Im just gonna leave this here ...... again. 🙄
(26) You should umm. You should really reconsider a LOT of politician, celebrity, and entertainer deaths over the years. Sometimes they know too much and are either vanished, or they vanish themselves.

“Not all suicides are suicides”.
(27) Yall may remember a thread I put together a month ago about camouflage. It ties in *perfectly* with this thread.

Use the camouflage, and these tools, and youll be navigating bullshit and shills like Magellan.

Link to Camo thread: https://threader.app/thread/1292390790178766850
(28) We really hope this thread can help some of you navigate the seas, so to speak. The waters will get rough and murky. There will be detractors, shills, and trolls like you have never seen.

Like post #1 says; dont feed the trolls. Use evidence, facts, and a calm candor…
(29) to handle an argument or debate. Most shills and trolls only want to get you banned, or harassed. It isn’t worth winning an online argument you wont win. Nothing you can say will change a shill’s stance. Nothing.

Most who want to be awakened to the truth will listen
(30) almost immediately. They will be somewhat open, and non-aggressive. Shills and trolls are the opposite. They will immediately use the tactics in this thread to cause anger, doubt, division, and confusion.
(31) All of the memes and info in this thread are free for the taking. Save the memes, share them, and help others understand how best to fight against shills, trolls, and disinformation agents.

RT, copy and paste ... whatever you need to get this out there. We feel these are.
(32) valuable tools in the information war. Remember - these folks are professionals, dont let them rattle you!!!

Thank you for reading and sharing. And thank you as well for the interest! May you all be blessed with light and love.

Namaste. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
(33) I dont usually do this anymore, but I want 👀’s on this one, so tags incoming!
(37) Co-creators of thread: @ergonoatia & @11AngelAura11
You can follow @Absolute1776.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: