WHO’S BACKING BEN HOUCHEN, TEES VALLEY MAYOR?  
 
EPISODE 2
 
The majority of donations from Ben Houchen’s supporters are in cash, some from individuals, some from companies.
In addition to this, however, over the past three years, there have also been some non-cash donations.
 
Precisely what these consist of the Electoral Commission register doesn’t state.  
 
Of these we believe that one source, in particular, demands clarification from Mr Houchen.
And Sirius Minerals is controversial.  
 
In its attempts to set up a mine to exploit polyhalite reserves on land near Whitby, it attracted thousands of small, local, investors.
York Potash Ltd (founded by Chris Fraser in 2010)  made its first donation (of £5,500) to Ben Houchen, in 2018. 
 
Sirius was receiving favourable reviews in the business press and investment analysts were predicting great things ahead for the company.  
  http://fool.co.uk/investing/2018/06/23
And while acknowledging that the company had work to do to secure further funding for the project, it was often publicised (alongside a rising share price) that there was already market interest internationally for the polyhalite.    
  https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/business/business-news/sirius-minerals-shares-rise-after-14805619.amp
On Sept 17th 2019, shortly before the company’s second donation (£3,250) to Houchen, it was reported its project was in difficulty.

In order to raise the necessary funds it had attempted to issue bonds. It needed a guarantor.
 
UK government refused.
  https://www.ft.com/content/7afe6cba-d913-11e9-8f9b-77216ebe1f17
As a Downing Street spokesperson said "When examining any request for financing, we have to assess the potential of a project against the need to protect taxpayers' money." 
  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49725711
The failure of the government to support the project can be interpreted in various ways.
It could be evidence of the Westminster government’s continuing reluctance to invest in the northern economy. 
 
In which case the ‘levelling up’ agenda that was one the main planks of Boris Johnson’s subsequent election campaign was actually entirely cynical.
This would put Houchen in a difficult position as his plans for the regeneration of the region’s economy rely on the government’s willingness to invest heavily to enable redevelopment.
If neither May’s nor Johnson’s government were prepared to support the Sirius project, what hope would there be for other necessary investment?
An alternative interpretation is to take the government at face value, and conclude that Sirius had overstated the viability of the project.
 
Maybe the venture was never the surefire investment opportunity the company had led shareholders to believe.
  https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/business/business-news/york-potash-sirius-minerals-share-9561579
There is also a third possibility. 
 
As first reported in the Guardian in June this year, Treasury minister Robert Jenrick, met with billionaire Idan Ofer, the ultimate owner of the UK mining company Cleveland Potash, on 21st March 2018:  
 
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/720481/transparency_HMT_ministers_Jan-March_2018.csv/preview
“At the time, Jenrick was assessing whether to offer state support for a new potash mine being built by a rival company, Sirius Minerals, which was set to provide intense competition to Ofer’s loss-making business.
A full investigation of the case has yet to be made.
So, at this stage, we have a hypothetical situation in which a government minister may have favoured a rival company and the fault is neither the government’s indifference to economic recovery in the north, nor alleged disingenuousness by the directors of Sirius.
Were this the case, then, in the resulting tug-of-war between Jenrick and Houchen; Houchen (and Sirius, and its investors) came second.
But it has to be said that Houchen’s response to the sale of Sirius to Anglo American was, in certain respects, surprising.  
 
As reported in Business Live in January:
“Ben Houchen, Tees Valley Mayor, said the announcement was a massive vote of confidence in the  project.”
As the evidence of the Electoral Commission shows that Houchen received gifts from York Potash Ltd, we have to ask what, precisely, the directors thought they could achieve by courting Ben Houchen?
 
Could it be his well-honed PR machine?
In other words, the prospect of jobs in the region was Houchen’s take on the story, to the apparent exclusion of the issue of shareholders’ losses.
The Electoral Commission’s records help to protect people in public life from spurious allegations of impropriety.  But they should not be seen as a ‘Get out of jail free’ card.
Ben Houchen has been contacted for comment.
You can follow @TeesVMonitor.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: