Read on Twitter
First the NYT now the BBC picks up on the explosive story of FALSE COVID-19 POSITIVES.
It's become crystal clear that local officials were willing to devastate economies & societies based on fear of the unknown-& they were wrong on just about everything. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54000629
It's become crystal clear that local officials were willing to devastate economies & societies based on fear of the unknown-& they were wrong on just about everything. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54000629
Remember - according to the New York Times, in MA/NV/NY, up to 90% of reported positives were non-infectious based on the sensitivity of the cycle threshold for the PCR tests.
We still don't know what the cycle threshold is for Arizona or most other states.
We still don't know what the cycle threshold is for Arizona or most other states.
Arizona has completed 1,250,981 PCR tests to date.
Only 12.3% of those tests have been reported positives. 87.7% are negative results.
Over 150,000 Arizonans have tested positive after taking a PCR test.
Only 12.3% of those tests have been reported positives. 87.7% are negative results.
Over 150,000 Arizonans have tested positive after taking a PCR test.
IF Arizona has a cycle threshold comparable to MA/NV/NY, up to 90% of these positive results could be non-infectious.
That means up to 135,000 of those positive tests are called into question.
That means up to 135,000 of those positive tests are called into question.
Arizonans need to demand answers from our local government officials about the basis for which they are compiling these positive COVID-19 results and about the sensitivity of the PCR tests for our state.
Too many policies and edicts are being issued without the citizens having a complete picture of the data or rationale.
