Read on Twitter
Who is this arab women? Whats the name? https://twitter.com/SanataniMan/status/1300482650851799041">https://twitter.com/SanataniM...
Bro i told you 
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="đ" title="Neutrales Gesicht" aria-label="Emoji: Neutrales Gesicht">
You just used a fabricated hadith
You just used a fabricated hadith
The alleged assination of Asma: The first story that critics of Islam spread around is the assination of Asma of the tribe of Aus. She is said to have been a poetess who made fun of Prophet Muhammad saying that he killed many of their chiefs (not true). (1/6)
When Prophet Muhamamd heard this he allegedly asked a Muslim named Umair to kil her. He brutally murdered her and Prophet Muhammad praised him for this deed. (2/6)
The story of the killing of Asma& #39; bint Marwan is mentioned by Ibn Sa& #39;d in Kitab At-Tabaqat Al-Kabir[10] and by the author of Kinz-ul-& #39;Ummal under number 44131 who attributes it to Ibn Sa& #39;d, Ibn & #39;Adiyy and Ibn & #39;Asaker. (3/6)
What is interesting is that Ibn & #39;Adiyy mentions it in his book Al-Kamel on the authority of Ja& #39;far Ibn Ahmad Ibn Muhammad Ibn As-Sabah on authority of Muhammad Ibn Ibrahim Ash-Shami on authority of Muhammad Ibn Al-Hajjaj Al-Lakhmi on authority of Mujalid on authority of (4/6)
Ash-Shu& #39;abi on authority of Ibn & #39;Abbas, and added that
...this isnâd (chain of reporters) is not narrated on authority of Mujalid but by Muhammad Ibn Al-Hajjaj and they all (other reporters in the chain) accuse Muhammad Ibn Al-Hajjaj of forging it. (5/6)
...this isnâd (chain of reporters) is not narrated on authority of Mujalid but by Muhammad Ibn Al-Hajjaj and they all (other reporters in the chain) accuse Muhammad Ibn Al-Hajjaj of forging it. (5/6)
[13]
It is also reported by Ibn al-Gawzi in Al-& #39;Ilal[14] and is listed among other flawed reports.
So according to its isnâd (chain of transmitters), the report is forged - because one of its reporters is notorious for fabricating hadÎth. (6/7)
It is also reported by Ibn al-Gawzi in Al-& #39;Ilal[14] and is listed among other flawed reports.
So according to its isnâd (chain of transmitters), the report is forged - because one of its reporters is notorious for fabricating hadÎth. (6/7)
Hence, such this story is rejected and 100% false. Moreover this story is never found in the hadith, Bukhari, Muslim, etc
(7/7)
(7/7)
