Thread by @HouseIsBorgia, I cannot respect a "reporter" who says he did SIX hours of [...]

I cannot respect a "reporter" who says he did SIX hours of research on a story in which *hundreds* of people hours has been expended on researching her story.

The print interviews, the podcast interviews, the available legal documents, etc.

This here is hack journalism. https://twitter.com/ProudSocialist/status/1302052418973126656

https://twitter.com/ProudSocialist/status/1302052418973126656

Oh man and not only that, but he COMPLETELY mischaracterizes @ReadeAlexandra's personal GoFundMe as something JUST for the NRVDC. Wow.

So thanks to @TaraReadeTruth , we have confirmation that she FLED to WA in 1997 to avoid the visitation judgement that was handed down in early Summer '97 (as per the Krassenstein's Medium files -- which still document her obstruction).

Thanks, Avalon & @ReadeAlexandra! LOL

And nice going covering the tracks of @ProudSocialist's 100% mischaractization of @ReadeAlexandra's FIRST PERSONAL GoFundMe being a fund for abuse victims in his recent podcast by creating ANOTHER GoFundMe for "Alexandra Reade"!

Are you kidding me? The GRIFT.

And it's really gross that THAT picture is used. It's not current. She psychologically abused her daughter (as per various witness accounts). Her mom's dead but it's not like she wouldn't lie for Reade, since she was an active participant in obstructing visitation.

Tara Reade's the grift that keeps on grifting.

Unbelievable.

(Screencaps came from the Krassenstein docs on their Medium post.)

Judge Allen had ordered visitation for Ted Dronen, against Tara Reade's wishes. The rest of the docs in that 94 pg file detail a hurt & vengeful Reade & her mother obstructing his visitation.

Filed 7/11/97

A few days later in an ex parte action to show cause for modifying the visitation, Ted's lawyer Ed Somogyi notes: "Unfiled - fees not paid, Respondent came in and picked up all but face page 8/2(2?)/97; states she will refile DVR"

If you read the whole of those docs, Dronen was trying to get Tara Reade to let him visit his young daughter. These Somogyi noted docs are a PUBLIC part of the last pieces we had before @TaraReadeTruth came up with the unnecessarily redacted more recent docs, and they tell us...

...a lot about what happened as the divorce was happening. A divorce that came out of violent acts but also whose details included a man who practically begged for the courts to force a psych eval for BOTH him and his soon to be ex/mother of his child... (cont'd)

...and a man who was by the SLO courts to have been found to be compliant with court orders while Reade was not.

These docs have been up at Krassenstein's posts for MONTHS. People have had literal months to read them and understand all of this.

@HKrassenstein's (husband's) Medium article didn't include the 1999 termination of parental rights docs, which appears redacted and cropped over at @TaraReadeTruth's long & patronizing argumentum ad passiones for @ReadeAlexandra.

But TRT's clarification is a bit of a gift.

1/

(This is an additional expository to the enduring pattern of negative & dysfunctional behavior others have written about, nothing else. All information has been gleaned from published, available court documents. We know there are more that may come to light in the future.)

1a/

To start, Reade started work for CA State Senator Jack O'Connell in April of 1995, according to the Income & Expense Declaration by Reade filed on April 26, 1996.

2/

(Minor observation, bc everyone lies on their resume, & thanks to @MatthewKeysLive for posting in June: Under her NEW name, Reade said she worked for O'Connell from 1993 - 1998. But then on a later resume said she worked for him from 1994 - 1997, both contradicting reality.)

3/

@ReadeAlexandra was awarded child support, documents filed on November 18, 1996. She was to receive $530 from Dronen until the child was grown.

4/

According to Reade's Income & Expense Declaration for the visitation disputes, she no longer worked for O'Connell & started work at Roxanne Ware Law Office on May 5, 1997, declared on a doc filed on June 13, 1997.

She was also receiving $530 in child support from Dronen.

5/

On July 7, 1997, the judge RULED AGAINST @ReadeAlexandra's request for continuance of supervised visitation.

The their daughter's lawyer (she had someone representing her needs) requested unsupervised visitation for a mere 3 hours on weekends.

Cont'd

6a/

Judge Allen's judgment, July 7, 1997: "Based on the documents before the Court, the Court finds that Mr. Dronen has done everything the court has required and Orders that he shall have one 3-hour unsupervised visitation per week..."

6b/

Allen's Order for Dronen's visitation rights was filed a few days later, on July 11, 1997. A hearing was scheduled for October 6, 1997, but any existent documents from later hearings are unavailable to us.

7/

A few days after THAT on July 15, 1997 (AFTER the order was handed down) a final Income & Expense Declaration was filed, where Reade wrote that her only income was the $530, as she checked the box stating that she was currently unemployed.

8/

Along with the above "I have no job" declaration, Reade was going to file yet another an Order to Show Cause for Modification of Visitation, Child Support, & Attorney's Fees, even though ALL of that had already JUST been adjudicated.

9a/

Dronen's lawyer noted: "Unfiled - fees not paid; Respondent (Reade) came in and picked up all but face page 8/22(?)/1997; states she will refile DVR"

This is important; after ALL the work Dronen did to "earn" his 3 hours of visitation, Reade was plotting to refile her DVR.

10/

We didn't have anything after until @TaraReadeTruth gifted us with the New Beginnings letter & the heavily cropped termination of Dronen's parental rights for their child.

We know now that she sought New Beginnings' legal aid shortly after Allen ruled against her in July.

11/

Here's the TLDR; timeline of what these documents describe.

Do these Reade people mean for us to believe that after a female judge found that he had fulfilled his requirements for his visitation, Dronen just suddenly got violent enough for Reade to've fled to WA?

12/

This isn't about "class shaming", or survivor shaming, or whatever it is that Reade and her people are claiming happened. The filings show that there was a pattern of toxic obstructive and vengeful behavior on Reade's part.

Absent an additional, sudden violent encounter,

13/

Reade didn't get what she wanted from Judge Allen at first, so in late 1997 she went up north for a more sympathetic ear.

Sometime between Allen's July 11, 1997 and March 17, 1999 judgments, Reade was able to convince people of the danger she was supposedly in...

14/

...and got Dronen to agree to terminate the parental rights he had been working and fighting hard for (via the available filings).

What do you think, if anything, she said and did for Dronen to give up his rights? What's the most logical scenario in this particular case?

15/

Reade has attempted to resurrect her Biden accusations via podcasters sympathetic to her story. Her champions watch doubters in order to accuse them of various plots against her or of "threats", "stalking", etc.

Nothing could be further from the truth (well, besides Reade).

16/

It was @ProudSocialist who just a few days ago claimed that he did five hours of "research" on her story. After I tweeted that insufficiency along w/the knowledge that I had at the time from available court documents, @TaraReadeTruth decided on that long post.

17/

So thank you, TRT. Despite the additional questions it brings re: Ted & the child between July 1997 to March 1999, it clarified when she sought legal help from a Washington State advocacy group: practically right after a judge ruled against her.

/fin (for now)

Latest Threads Unrolled: