It is noticeable right now that we are separating into two camps based on risk assessment and priorities, which do not precisely match up with party interest.

Camp 1 is defined by expansive rhetoric about the looming threat of takeover by political extremists, intense verbal reaction to news cycle stories which fade in 3-5 days, and very little else in the way of concrete action. The sky falls, as they mosey. https://mobile.twitter.com/TheAgeofShoddy/status/1301926627723493376

Camp 2 is defined by people who, for one reason or another, do not bite as hard on the head fakes of the news cycle, and tether their concerns less to extremist catastophizing and abstractions and more to concrete and specific concerns. Less variance, more reality.

Note that this is not the same distinction as political people/normal people from this thread. No one on political twitter is normal; the difference is that some can perceive normality and react, while others have only their own camp as a reference point. https://mobile.twitter.com/CharlotteAlter/status/1301715512309809153