Read on Twitter
THREAD: I& #39;m triggered by these tweets.
I had 7 pregnancy losses and spent hrs staring at non-digital tests trying to see if there& #39;s a line or not (an experience replicated by so many women in similar positions). There is relief in a test that simply says yes or no. https://twitter.com/Foone/status/1301723119003086849">https://twitter.com/Foone/sta...
I had 7 pregnancy losses and spent hrs staring at non-digital tests trying to see if there& #39;s a line or not (an experience replicated by so many women in similar positions). There is relief in a test that simply says yes or no. https://twitter.com/Foone/status/1301723119003086849">https://twitter.com/Foone/sta...
W ability to monitor ovulation and check w/in days of implantation if ur pregnant, tests have never needed to be smarter. Any woman can look at the price of tests n go the cheaper option of course. We need options. I& #39;m not saying digital tests are better but they serve a purpose.
If you go to MC support grps, there are 1000s of women posting pics of non-digital tests, often with a wedding ring around result window, asking if anyone can see the line. Women reference "line eyes" bc they stop relying on what they can see bc it& #39;s skewed by hope or fear.
Early pregnancy loss is complicated and messy and really misunderstood. I understand the point OP is making, but life isn& #39;t this simple. There are other reasons may choose to buy a digital test. That& #39;s all. Fin.
Sorry, one more point in addition to the one I& #39;ve made, though they& #39;re related. @RealSexyCyborg also points out that misreading is common and therefore the digital tests can help with that too. https://twitter.com/RealSexyCyborg/status/1301786032136835072">https://twitter.com/RealSexyC...
Huge thank to you @RealSexyCyborg for making this point.
And another extremely relevant perspective from @Siocain_. Thank you. https://twitter.com/Siocain_/status/1301842403779850241?s=20">https://twitter.com/Siocain_/...
