So the latest Posie Parker video is full of homophobic misinformation about sex ed and she's making money hand over fist in the superchats.

Kinda recommend this one gets reported.

This includes claims that pictures of sexual organs are pornographic amongst other shit. Just TradCon bullshit.

She seems to mainly be getting her information not direct from the source but from using the propaganda material that Transgender Trend are putting out *describing* what the sex ed sessions look like. So it's this Chinese whispers alarmist bullshit.

She finishes the video by giving the viewers an action plan for writing letters to protest their local sex ed programme. "You're the expert, that's what we need to remember here"

She's claiming shit like children are being taught blood play and felching at school. It's so fucking wild.

Calling BLM "the MRAs at speakers corner".

Nice move there talking about black women that way

There's all these comments from people who have no idea what's going on, they're just scared the gays are coming for their kids.

And it's all fucking lies.

Now she's giving out homework, pushing Jacky Doyle Price and Abigail Shrier, telling people to get their local policy, telling them to write letters, saying "you don't need to worry about studies"

"Ask the teacher what they think about felching, all the teacher what they think about blood play. Write to Ofsted about the proud trust, about mermaids..."

It seems like the felching thing may have come from a different programme by a different group (if it existed at all) but hard to find evidence of it https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/warwickshire-county-council-scraps-programme-18081080.amp

This campaign initially started with a push by (far right group) Christian Concern and then followed up predictably by transgender Trend and Posie

In fact according to http://Web.archive.org , the accompanying website (aimed at sex ed for teenagers, so plausibly people already having sex) was taken down already in January this year as a result of legal challenges.

Ok so it looks like one of the things on the website they had was a "sextionary".

Given this is a self service resource for teens, I'd rather they were getting their answers there than a porn site.

The website doesn't seem to have archived nicely (fucking JavaScript)

My best guess from this though is that felching and breath play might have been terms in the "sextionary". Again, as a self service resource, I'd rather a dictionary of things young people hear in a playground from edgy porn users than other kids looking at porn to find out.

There's no "how to do kinky shit" section in the site structurally speaking, there's just a bunch of practical stuff that might be useful to young people who are imminently likely to be having sex because that's a fact about many teens.

This is an important point, they bang on about safeguarding. They bang on about how evil Andrew Moffat is.

Meanwhile Safeguarding as a field is giving him keynote speeches. These people have zero clue about child safety and it shows.

https://www.oneeducation.co.uk/news-blog/safeguarding-conference-2020-keynote-speaker-andrew-moffat https://twitter.com/jjfox123/status/1302014880271261696

Literally, the education and child welfare field cannot get enough of him. He's bordering on an education Saint.

Given all the attention this has gotten before TT and Posie Parker and the GC crowd got on the scene, and given the info isn't available anymore, it looks like most of the info people have comes from:
- Christian Concern
- the Daily Mail reporting on Christian Concern

This is the kind of coverage that Christian Concern's claims were getting. There's little indication that this is actually accurate, to be clear. This is just "critics say..."

Actually further down they do go into further detail.

If you have had a 6 year old, you've probably had to have this conversation with your 6 year old (and frankly it's fine for schools to non-shamefully tell kids about basic social norms)

So far from being a masturbation lesson like the headline it's a "don't do this around other people, cheers" lesson.

I don't know on what earth that could be misconstrued as sexualising children.

Also, serious safeguarding matter, teaching kids that shit like that shouldn't be happening around anyone else is one way to protect them from people who might sexualise them, and gives children being groomed opportunities to speak up or ask questions. Win win.

[Sui]

I'm now following the trail over to Transgender Trend's stuff that Posie read some of.

What's horrific here is that they've expanded the bullshit "against Samaritans guidelines" narrative they use on trans suicide to a young lesbian who took her own life.

I think one of the things about their claims about Samaritans Guidelines is that they desperately want it to be a taboo to investigate or discuss aggravating factors which result in young people killing themselves (such as religious pressures on the child etc).

They spend a while mocking the Proud Trusts claims to being "life saving", but they provide free counseling to LGBT youth in a climate where mental health support is extremely sparse on the NHS. Of course it's life saving.

Anyway the rest of that is horseshit panicking about frank conversations being had with teens about sex, local groups for LGBT young people to meet up and get along etc.

Alright, I've found a good archive of what the Sextionary looked like.

We find the term "Felch" where they literally just explain what the word means.

For teens who are likely to hear the word from edgy friends and want to know. This is fine. Big deal. https://archive.is/nJBxV 

"you've got no idea what's been happening in the last 6 months in education"

Says some gender crit as if the usual safeguarding has somehow suddenly been suspended and children are being taught bondage in preschool.

It's like a sketch show of arse kissing and melodrama over nothing whatsoever.

(also, side note: if sex ed material can't be explicit how on earth is it going to be accurate? Surely it should be clear enough and clarified plainly for teens to understand?)