I have been thinking about this concept a lot lately given where "high quality" assets, predominantly multifamily and industrial, have been trading recently. https://twitter.com/PinkPoloShorts/status/1277620364118499329">https://twitter.com/PinkPoloS...
I& #39;ve been seeing a bias towards a lot of higher-cap rate assets with the sentiment being that you& #39;ll make higher cash returns and hold longer, so who cares about residual value. I think there& #39;s a fallacy in that argument - higher cap-rate assets trade that way for a reason.
Either they are lower quality physical real estate, they are in locations that do not have strong prospects, or they are of a size that limits the potential buyer pool (i.e. too small for a professional investor).
Yes, your cash on cash return is higher, but there is significantly more risk to the stability of those cash flows. Now here& #39;s where you are going to say "but I& #39;m below replacement cost, no one can compete with me on price".
If that& #39;s the case that also means there& #39;s likely not going to be significant rent growth because if there were, it would attract more supply. Here& #39;s where you have the risk to your cash flows...
If you purchase an asset at a 8 cap, and make a 12% levered cash return, and you sell it for what you paid for it, you make a roughly 12% compounded return. However, if you can& #39;t grow rents, your operating cost growth at stabilization is going to outpace your rent growth.
Which means that your NOI ultimately declines. Eventually, and this differs by asset class, you& #39;ll be forced to put capital back into the asset to make it more competitive. Here& #39;s where you say "there& #39;s no new supply so I don& #39;t need to renovate".
Problem there is that it kills your residual value. If the quality of the real estate degrades, your appraised value won& #39;t be where you think it is, or no buyer is going to take you out at the cap rate you thought. Now maybe you& #39;re selling for less than you paid.
Even if you took a lot of cash out, that kills the ultimate return. And we& #39;re back to the reason that you were able to buy at a high cap rate in the first place - you bought an asset that, for whatever reason, was challenged and undesirable.
Now there& #39;s lots of value in re-investing the cash you make elsewhere - that& #39;s a different conversation. Further, there& #39;s a risk that the cap rate environment moves against you. There is such a thing as cap rate expansion, and you& #39;re more at risk the worse quality RE you have.
10 years ago select-service hotels trading at 12 caps, storage trading north of 10, and suburban multifamily trading north of 7. It can happen. Yes, if you don& #39;t sell it may not impact you immediately, but you need to refinance at some point, and a cash-in refi is a return killer
Now I& #39;m not saying go out and buy 80s vintage multifamily at a 4 cap, rather, I& #39;m saying that your return is based on your basis, your stabilized yield, and what the asset will be worth in the future. Neglect any one of those at your own risk.
You can follow @PinkPoloShorts.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: