RECOVERY results suggest a mortality benefit in this population (supp O2 only), and I have seen basically every patient in this category receive dex, appropriately... but there are enough odd features of this single open-label trial that make me wonder. /2
Much of this nuance is explained well in this thread by @FranciscoMarty_

https://twitter.com/FranciscoMarty_/status/1293550705865822208?s=20

The">https://twitter.com/Francisco... main thing that nags me personally is how ridiculously high the mortality was in RECOVERY - 26.2% among those requiring O2 and receiving usual care /3
This is much higher than what I& #39;ve seen reported in other high-resource settings. Eg study from Boston https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👇" title="Rückhand Zeigefinger nach unten" aria-label="Emoji: Rückhand Zeigefinger nach unten"> found 15% mortality among ALL admitted patients (42% critically ill) /4 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30248-0/fulltext">https://www.thelancet.com/journals/...
Maybe @EricMeyerowitz can explain to me why mortality for people on supp O2 was so different in RECOVERY, but this, along with the even more dubious effect of dex in those not on O2, makes me question reflexively giving steroids to pts admitted with COVID-19 on low-flow O2 /end
You can follow @AaronRichterman.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: