this doesn’t even make any sense: ‘pleasing-to-liberal fake news’

this is an example of a frayed word salad, the staple of predatoryNT https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1300837499481321473

having lately analyzed Greenwald’s posturing, stances & now word salads, i’ve only now realized how amazingly the modern predatory-neurodivergent mind works:

~ polarizing every issue even where not necessary: an attempt to organize information on a primitive level of black&white

the ‘white’ polar opposite in human predatory mind is the side the predator sees itself identifying with, or it being advantageous to *it in either material sense or reflecting well on the image it wants to project to the world —
while the ‘black’ side is the rejected side..

*it

i usually refer to the predatoryNT as an ‘it’ because the human being has not evolved a self-conscious identity, it runs on phosphate-nitrate nucleic programs, predatory instinctive algorithms and reality reflection/ masking/ mirroring - -

- - it is the least nuanced human

word salad: ‘pleasing-to-liberal fake news’

let’s deconstruct:
‘fake news’ is a term conjured by predatoryNT right wing to convey the complex liberal message it is not able to process, thus it appears ‘fake’ to the least nuanced humans;

— the neurodivergent reality processing

‘pleasing-to-liberal’ -
liberals are highly reality processing, complex, self aware, self conscious, with strong identity humans

there is no pleasing liberals - it is a biased polarizing phrase where ‘pleasing’ doesn’t occur..

it clearly evidences the author is #predatoryNT

complex, empathic, liberal humans do not need pleasing or be creating fake news - - this is something a primitive human is unable to process in its neurodivergent limits - - it projects its own limits on more complex humans - -
thus the word salad ‘pleasing-to-liberal fake news’

as to Greenwald: to the liberal mind he appears to be a highly polarizing, confusing figure, a puzzle many of them find unsolvable, until you understand neurodiversity - -
he’s not liberal, not conservative, not independent, not even pro-Israel, not pro neo-con ..

what is he?

he kinda looms large
like there is this seemingly mysterious individual with no side to him, cannot be really pinpointed..

this is because he’s a vacuous, hollow, empty mirror reflecting its horizons: https://in.toil.blog/archives/627 

this is what ‘got me’ for a long time, the appearance of objectivity - - objectivity is consistent, reflectivity is not..
i’ve felt gaslighted into believing there must be some unknown data to justify the view there was no colusion with foreign entities when obviously there was..

it turns out, the only evidence that there was no collusion with Russia is Greenwald’s dictatorial opinion - - because he says so..
because he is @ggreenwald

even though it shockingly contradicts his prior stances warning against overreaches of unfettered executive powers..

here’s objective evidence for the collusion(s)
(1)
President: I would like you to do us a favor though [...] I guess you have one of your wealthy people...

President Zelenskyy: For me as a President, it is very important and we are open for any future cooperation.

|
|
V

(2)
President: I would like you to do us a favor though [...] I guess you have one of your wealthy people... (with contacts to the famous Russian hackers)

President Putin: For me as a President, it is very important and we are open for any future cooperation.

phone call erased

when you listen to some of the Greenwald interviews, discussing the Flynn case, he defends the powers of the Executive, citing Yeltzin among others, how ‘presidents help each other all the time, and nothing’s wrong with that’ —

which evidences an utter absence of understanding..

Greenwald gaslights its audience, normalizing unethical executive behaviors, justifying them with precedents - - if you go back in time enough all the way to monarchs, you’ll encounter more & more examples that build a massive case of precedents - - do they make it right?

for the hard of understanding:
the core issue here is treason - soliciting foreign aid against one’s own..
Russia did not solicit Western aid in overthrowing the steel cold socialism, it is a totally different issue which Greenwald ignores -is it a lie by omission or commission?

Greenwald adores the powers of the executive, admires the powerful, and craves the privileges of dictatorial power that come from having an influencer platform like the @theintercept in shaping perceptions, opinions, and impacting events —
mostly to his own benefit - #narcissism

why doesn’t Greenwald, my current case study of modern predatory human, understand ‘treason’?
incredibly, considering his comprehensive authorship?

#predatory humans do not attach — they don’t attach emotionally to another human, they do not attach meanings to #words

Greenwald’s speech is polished, the choice of #words so sophisticated, yet no one else seems to be using most of these anymore - -

beneath these linguistically riveting paragraphs there is no meaning, the signifieds are missing - - these are bare, lonely reflected signifiers..

@ggreenwald has no guts to discuss with me, because he knows he’s a straw-man, a hollow smear machine - - can’t help himself but smear somebody every day using polarizing tactics, lying by omission & who knows by whose commission ..

defeating Greenwald’s straw-men

The U.S. Congress passed the Patriot Act that necessitates drone killings of suspect terrorists, the law is not at the discretion or power of the Executive - -

Greenwald chooses to conceal this, launching a smear: ‘Obama assassinated..’

defeating Greenwald’s straw-men

the reality is ... it is the American people, including the U.S. citizen Glenn Greenwald, who indirectly assassinated these suspect terrorists by electing representatives who passed the Patriot Act ->

@ggreenwald assassinated ‘terrorist suspects’

defeating Greenwald’s lies

if Obama were not to assassinate ‘suspect terrorists’ he’d break the law legislated & passed by Congress - - to stop the assassinations American citizens ought to advocate against the Patriot Act - - Obama as the President simply followed the law..

defeating Greenwald’s smear campaigns

the question is why does @ggreenwald defend Trump’s treasonous deals with foreign enemies and slanders Obama for following the law?

1) is he a racist
2) is he a right wing shill who religiously follows neocon @BillKristol

your guess..

defeating @ggreenwald

Greenwald wants to get it right, he thinks he got it right: drone killing/ assassinating someone feels much heavier to an average mind than talking to foreign enemy on the phone..

yet, he doesn’t get it right, because he doesn’t understand what is right..

he does not know intuitively what is right..

- predatoryNT #neurodiversity

he has to reflect what is right, and reflect he does ever so superficially, awkwardly, ingenuinely - - missing all the nuances, organic truths..

advertising polished, stale, dead principles..

predatory humans in the institutions of the law, in positions of power and application of justice are dangerous to the society - -
they don’t understand emotionally - - the human aspect is missed, and so are our prisons filled with thousands of rigid unjust sentences..

a predatory judge is 100x more likely to sentence a vulnerable, powerless, minority, non white human and 100x more likely to protect kindred predatory person: the powerful, the white from serving justice in the same circumstances ..

Knowing #neurodiversity

this thread is a linguistic study of moderately functioning predatory neurotype:

~ how an absence of emotional intelligence #EQ impacts the use of language
~ how language is used by predatoryNTs
~ how predatory humans don’t understand the moral universe

@threadreaderapp unroll