In the military there are RULES, PROCEDURES, DIRECTIVES and Constitution that they have to go by.

I promised to make this better for people who came after me.

The issue I am finding is that should a military commander break the 1st paragraph above, there is no consequence.

#1

I am using my case.... Have ran across others also.

I am told that if what the @DeptofDefense misses or the @USArmy misses as far as rules being broken then the @DeptVetAffairs, @VAVetBenefits is allowed to use.

There is NO Rules of Evidence for the VA to go by..

#2

Hence, if my commander Joshua Waddy did edit (which he did) discharge papers ILLEGALLY THEN for the VA it doesn't matter because their is no law telling them that evidence is INADMISSIBLE.

They (VA) are able to use whatever is added to iPERMS that then trickles to VA.

#3

When the statements of my rape case were added to my Offical Personal Military File and nothing else then even though it is AGAINST the Privacy Act the VA is allowed to use that because...

NO RULES, LAWS, ECT regulate what the VA is allowed to use .

#4

The Federal Rules of Evidence dictate what is allowed. However the @DeptVetAffairs is not bound by those rules.

They should be but they are not.

Holding a bag with no justice.
You cannot sue the military for injuries incidental to military service which includes discipline

As it was told to me, "His command did not add his ARREST or anything from the rape accusation. SO WE CAN'T CONSIDER IT."

Again, if the rules are broken on Military side doesn't mean VA or @SecWilkie can't use it.

What is deemed against the law is OPEN for the VA to use.

Do you get it yet?
Isn't this some kind of bull?
Rules of Evidence in military cases require:
1. TIMELY
2. COMPLETE
3. RELEVLANT

these things go on to lead to the CREDIBILITY OF THE WITNESSES.

EXCLUDED EVIDENCE is evidence gathered that VIOLATES FEDERAL LAW.

I rest my case.