This is part 2 of the thread I wrote on how @ss_suryawanshi in his book Checkmate has twisted the facts to harm the reputation of @Dev_Fadnavis and BJP.

His animosity for Devendra Fadnavis is clear from the fact that even for the BJP’s good performance in the 2017 BMC elections, he gave credit to Ashish Shelar and tried to sideline Devendra Fadnavis.

He writes “In the 2017 BMC elections, under the leadership of Ashish Shelar, the BJP got 82 seats while Sena got 86 seats.” On the Maharashtra elections, he mentions that Sharad Pawar's ED incendece was the beginning of the end of the devendra Fadnavis government in Maharashtra

and that Pawar had won the battle of perception against the BJP. No matter how much it is denied by the haters, BJP was still the sole victor in Maharashtra with 105 seats. He further writes that the people wanted to keep the BJP out of power.

If that was the case, how did BJP get the highest % of vote share and became the single largest party? This undue advocacy for the people and collective statements on behalf of the people really pissed me off

He did not leave one chance of attacking Devendra Fadnavis in his book. He openly claims that Devendra Fadnavis played a double game Ganesh Naik. He Promised ticket to Ganesh Naik as well as Manda Mhatre from the same Belapur constituency .

To put pressure over Naik, he asked Manda Mhatre to meet Uddhav Thackeray and contest on a Sena ticket. Then he convinved Naik that instead of letting the Belapur seat go to Shiv Sena, the party would be better off fielding Manda Mhatre again.

Without an iota of evidence, how can he claim that it was Devendra Fadnavis who asked Manda Mhatre to meet Uddhav Thackeray? She might have gone on her own suspecting that BJP would offer the ticket to Ganesh Naik.

Talking about the unholy MVA alliance, On the day the results were out (October 24th), Sanjay Raut met Sharad Pawar on his way to Pune from Mumbai, sat in his car and discussed about the govt formation. Raut gave confidence to Sharad Pawar that they could keep BJP out of power.

Pawar and Raut commuted together for more than an hour. So the BJP backing out of its promise was all just a show-off by the Shiv Sena? Shiv Sena had already made up its mind of backstabbing the BJP.

If the author's claim of Sanjay Raut commuting with Sharad Pawar on the day of the results is true then the Shiv Sena should apologise to the people of Maharashtra for lying all this time.

Another interesting thing to note is how the author knows the details about Sanjay Raut and Sharad Pawar's private conversation in the latter's car? Is he just bluffing and making up things in his book?

He further writes that after the Lok Sabha 2019 results, Sanjay Raut had told him that he was confident that the BJP would not honor the agreement. Changing the word is BJP's style.

The state assembly was the last opportunity to show BJP its place. Sanjay Raut had conveyed this message to NCP chief Sharad Pawar. If Sanjay Raut and Shiv Sena were so confident, why did they ally with the BJP and not fight the elections alone?

Sudhir Surywanshi has also unnecessarily tried to increase the stature of Sanjay Raut by saying that he was the single-man army who had successfully bulldozed the BJP's powerful social media machinery.

If the intentions are of deceit and breach of trust only, what else the others could do? But worry not, time will take care of everything “with interest”.

This thread again turned out to be longer than I had anticipated. I will post the next part in a separate thread by tonight or latest by tomorrow morning. Please help this thread reach the right audience. Your RT would mean a lot. Let us together bring the ‘deserving’ back.