People really out there defending Yazid like read a book guys the man set his armies loose on Medina for 3 days of looting and sent them to attack Makkah. The latter city was defended by Hazrat Zubair's sons but the Holy Kabaah (that building you do tawaaf around in case

Any of you are really THAT dumb) was damaged by catapults and fire destroyed its covering and various priceless artifacts stored inside.
You defend Yazid, you condone his attack on the 2 holy cities. They were his armies. He sent them.

The only thing that stopped the Makkan attack was news of his death. His generals rushed back to Damascus so they wouldn't miss out on the intrigue of selecting a new leader. People who defend him and his father I encourage you to read YOUR OWN BOOKS and speak to your own ulema

This thread is for people who are actually ignorant or misinformed. I urge you to read more history esp the tumultuous period during and after the reigns of the 3rd and 4th Caliphs andthe tragedy of Karbala. Imam Hussains a.s. martyrdom was the culmination of a rot that

Went deep into the very heart of the first Muslim nation. It is a heartbreaking and fascinating history but nothing is gained by ignoring it.
ISIS twitter on the other hand can go drown in sewage.