1/5 Remarkable accomplishment: A zero-C steel plant in Sweden, close to market costs. Bravo all https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👏" title="Applaus-Zeichen" aria-label="Emoji: Applaus-Zeichen">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👏" title="Applaus-Zeichen" aria-label="Emoji: Applaus-Zeichen">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👏" title="Applaus-Zeichen" aria-label="Emoji: Applaus-Zeichen">

A few thoughts on its relevance & importance. https://twitter.com/hybrit_project/status/1300441974898601985">https://twitter.com/hybrit_pr...
2/5 The plant uses existing technology (direct reduction of iron - DRI - with H2 electrolysis from nuclear & hydro power). It then upgrades the "sponge iron" to "pig iron" with an electric arc furnace (EAF). Core tech here.

What& #39;s new is combining them. https://www.midrex.com/technology/direct-reduced-iron/uses-of-dri/">https://www.midrex.com/technolog...
3/5 This is close to market parity ONLY because Sweden& #39;s grid is ~40% hydro & 40% nuke. This provides 90% capacity low-C electricity at ~$30/MWh.

This is essential: need both high capacity factors & low costs. With wind or solar alone (30% c.f.), power would have to be $5/MWh!!
4/6 Although impressive, the low-cost/low-C/high capacity factor requirements make it hard to reproduce facility elsewhere.

The same plant in the U.S. would almost double the cost of steel production to $750/ton hot-metal, costing >$1200/ton CO2 abatement.

CCS = MUCH cheaper
6/6 NOTE: The Swedish steel company SSAB has announced it will replace all existing steel production in Sweden with Hybrit-style plants. The push to replace existing assets with these is VERY good and VERY important.

Congratulations again Hybrit team on your accomplishments
You can follow @CarbonWrangler.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: