I agree it's in the community's best interest to reward builders.
But it's also in the builders best interest to build something with community-wide distributed ownsership.
Nothing against VCs either, but we are leveling the field to force them to compete with retailers. https://twitter.com/willwarren89/status/1299883870423146496
But it's also in the builders best interest to build something with community-wide distributed ownsership.
Nothing against VCs either, but we are leveling the field to force them to compete with retailers. https://twitter.com/willwarren89/status/1299883870423146496
In crypto there should be no privileges for any group wrt investment access(provided you have the money to participate)
I don't think this will discourage future builders b/c the message is clear:if you have a great idea & a fair token distrib. model, the community will fund it.
I don't think this will discourage future builders b/c the message is clear:if you have a great idea & a fair token distrib. model, the community will fund it.
Ofc you can choose to be funded by VCs instead, but then be prepared to face harsh competition.
Having a token (especially a widely distributed one) was never detrimental as many used to think. It's the mortar that aligns incentives & keeps the community together -the real moat.
Having a token (especially a widely distributed one) was never detrimental as many used to think. It's the mortar that aligns incentives & keeps the community together -the real moat.