This has got to be the most unintentionally hilarious one ever :)) utter innocence on three counts:

a) whether a stable form of Bali iconography exists (it doesn't)

b) how a "Christian saint like Jesus" (!) is depicted

c) most cripplingly, what native Indians really look like!

Here's a small sample of Bali iconography picked from Wikipedia. This is from Badami, Karnataka, 7th c AD, with the Bali figure highlighted on the right. Doesn't look very much like a member of the "choti and thread" club :)))

Here's another. Choti-thread? Why on earth (or sky or pataal) would they at all want to turn a Daitya king into that?

One more. Calcutta Art Studio. Which would make it 19th c Bengal (the same aesthetic zone that gave birth to the first visualised Bharat Mata, so don't diss it in a hurry).

As for the risibly sorry misidentification of a generalised Dravidian physiognomy, it can only come from an amazing bit of innocence. Here's two images of the prototype, from colonial-era ethnography. It's something all of us all over India know as part of the deepest part of us.

Ellaa visham... https://twitter.com/NSMlive/status/1300009683021750272?s=19