NOTES ON Q DROP 2: IF A TREE FALLS IN THE FOREST...

Yesterday, I mentioned that Drop 1 got hardly any engagement -- two replies total.

Drop 2 got only one reply. I'm sure Q was pleased that his prose style had caught /someone's/ eye, but the locals were mostly ignoring him.

And it's worth noting that the reply still asked for details: namely, /what/ Supreme Court case?

This put Q in a bind. He couldn't engage with that question -- because there IS no such SCOTUS case. He was just makin' shit up, so silence was the wisest course of action here.

If Q wanted to avoid the fate of the other LARPers he saw in this thread (and there were plenty, even aside from 0-drop Anon -- in fact, there was one right below that reply), he'd need to change his tactics.

The alternative would be to LARP hard, die young, and fade away.

So in drop 3, we'll see Q coming back with a new approach after he's had a good night's sleep to think it over.

His third drop would fit MUCH more closely w/the stuff anons had actually discussed today: Uranium 1, theories about Mueller targeting Dems, and, of course...

some good ol'-fashioned accusations of devil worship.

It may surprise you to hear that many anons *already believed* in a cabal of Satanist pedos prior to Q bringing it up -- but they sure did, to such an extent that the more cynical among them made observations like this:

That was posted about 5 hours prior to Q drop 3, which is the drop when Q first mentioned Satanism.

But details -- and the wildly-excessive number of supporting screenshots that I've gathered -- will have to wait for my thread on drop 3. That'll be out Monday at the earliest.

Tomorrow, I've got something else teed up: a thread highlighting the many, many similarities between QAnon and an earlier 4chan hoax: Victory of the Light.

Enjoy!