NOTES ON Q DROP 2: IF A TREE FALLS IN THE FOREST...

Yesterday, I mentioned that Drop 1 got hardly any engagement -- two replies total.

Drop 2 got only one reply. I& #39;m sure Q was pleased that his prose style had caught /someone& #39;s/ eye, but the locals were mostly ignoring him.
And it& #39;s worth noting that the reply still asked for details: namely, /what/ Supreme Court case?

This put Q in a bind. He couldn& #39;t engage with that question -- because there IS no such SCOTUS case. He was just makin& #39; shit up, so silence was the wisest course of action here.
If Q wanted to avoid the fate of the other LARPers he saw in this thread (and there were plenty, even aside from 0-drop Anon -- in fact, there was one right below that reply), he& #39;d need to change his tactics.

The alternative would be to LARP hard, die young, and fade away.
So in drop 3, we& #39;ll see Q coming back with a new approach after he& #39;s had a good night& #39;s sleep to think it over.

His third drop would fit MUCH more closely w/the stuff anons had actually discussed today: Uranium 1, theories about Mueller targeting Dems, and, of course...
some good ol& #39;-fashioned accusations of devil worship.

It may surprise you to hear that many anons *already believed* in a cabal of Satanist pedos prior to Q bringing it up -- but they sure did, to such an extent that the more cynical among them made observations like this:
That was posted about 5 hours prior to Q drop 3, which is the drop when Q first mentioned Satanism.

But details -- and the wildly-excessive number of supporting screenshots that I& #39;ve gathered -- will have to wait for my thread on drop 3. That& #39;ll be out Monday at the earliest.
Tomorrow, I& #39;ve got something else teed up: a thread highlighting the many, many similarities between QAnon and an earlier 4chan hoax: Victory of the Light.

Enjoy!
You can follow @DAL9001.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: