I have a feeling everyone thinks my tweets over the past day are about them.

They’re not.

You see, when Dugin talked about the philosophy of the sword, he distinctly mentioned the trifunctional state theory that Guenon, Evola and Dumézil subscribed to. It’s very fascinating.

“Here the question should be posed as follows: do we understand the Genonian and Evolaist model that all societies and all cultures are trifunctional, i.e. have these castes inevitably or is it a feature of Indo-European societies - this is a problem.”

Good question.

My take on it is that all societies have their own separate castes, and this is wildly apparent when you study India, Russia and South America. However,

The Anglosphere lacks a *proper* caste. That is, instead of merchants/warriors/managerial, it’s all nerds who fit neither.

A dissident movement should, in its caste, reflect the whole of society. Who are our merchants if not the grifters, our warriors if not the simps, our managerial if not the figureheads who astroturf token women that only seek to gather intel on them?

THAT is the better question.

Our true merchants remain anon, donate to groups and practice opsec. Our true warriors are ex or former military, national guard, you name it. Our true managerial are, however, not present. And that is a problem if you want to harness the true potential of a movement.

I agree with the Spencerian theory of NEEDING, not wanting or desiring...but NEEDing, a managerial elite who can fund us.

Outside of one group, there isn’t much to fund and the internecine gossip is hot and heavy.

It would not be a wise decision to invest for the elite.

I’m a lot smarter than I let on. I figured out the dynamics of power politics and philosophy while the supposed intellectuals run around in circles presupposing the metaphysical as the most important truth, and not the actual truth in itself which is power and hegemony.

This is, however, where Dugin remains conflicted. He understands power politics but lacks an approach that goes beyond theories.

Also, he’s an Orthodox perennialist. Think of Catboy Nick claiming he’s Catholic as a virtue signal and not because he attends church. Same thing.

Macron understands power. The problem is he’s a liberal who sees a civilization-state not in terms of pro-European regarding race, but pro-European in branding and appearance. The EU’s aesthetics are very implicitly white.

But they still want their denizens living multiculti.

The truth is, whites ARE in power still, but they’re not in charge. Huge difference.

So back to the need for a managerial elite - can those whites in power help us? Will they? The means certainly exist.

But when you claim to be anything other than your motive...you fail.

And so, I judge people not on what they claim to be, what they read or what their personal dissection of cancerous neoliberalism looks like: I judge on motive. On ego. On interests. Because that’s how the “dissident” right has always worked.