Veteran accounts, anecdotes by others, the logic that said unit was employed so thus it was, questionable history (but would depend on source usage and need proper analysis).
There are plenty of iffy vet accounts (and iffy interview techniques that lead) about.
There are plenty of iffy vet accounts (and iffy interview techniques that lead) about.
Some archives should almost apply caveats to certain interviews, to forewarn the generalist or unwary.
But then how far do you go etc?
Some of the worst factoids stem from period jokes, reported verbatim as if real events.
But then how far do you go etc?
Some of the worst factoids stem from period jokes, reported verbatim as if real events.