Read on Twitter
Excellent!
The dynamics shown in this video are 100% #UEF dynamics as they are explained (at a basic level) in my blog.
=All= of the "patterns" that dynamically appear in the video are empowered in UEF & #39;moving& #39; in the direction of maximum ephemerance.
=All= of the macroscopic https://twitter.com/ChemistryReacts/status/1299454711465205763">https://twitter.com/Chemistry...
The dynamics shown in this video are 100% #UEF dynamics as they are explained (at a basic level) in my blog.
=All= of the "patterns" that dynamically appear in the video are empowered in UEF & #39;moving& #39; in the direction of maximum ephemerance.
=All= of the macroscopic https://twitter.com/ChemistryReacts/status/1299454711465205763">https://twitter.com/Chemistry...
& #39;borderline-separations& #39; that are dynamically instantiated and & #39;sustained& #39; in both the blue and green mixtures are so instantiated and & #39;sustained& #39; in the #UEF_i_o of the #SSW_harmonics (& #39;atoms& #39; & & #39;molecules& #39;) that comprise the intermingled flluids.
The & #39;borders& #39; occur where
The & #39;borders& #39; occur where
UEF i/o flowing out of the SSWs of =each= fluid experiences the UEF gradient instantiated by the UEF i/o flowing out of the SSWs of "the other" fluid, in which gradient & #39;meeting& #39;, the physical power inherent in the & #39;meeting& #39; UEF gradients is plain-to-see and measure as it
performs measurable Physically Real Work in instantiating & & #39;sustaining& #39; the & #39;separations& #39; between & #39;borderlines& #39;.
In the green mixture, the & #39;cones& #39; of (I & #39;presume& #39;) & #39;iron& #39; SSWs are dynamically constructed - instantiated & & #39;sustained& #39; by exactly analogous UEF i/o flow dynamics,
In the green mixture, the & #39;cones& #39; of (I & #39;presume& #39;) & #39;iron& #39; SSWs are dynamically constructed - instantiated & & #39;sustained& #39; by exactly analogous UEF i/o flow dynamics,
with respect to which the Physically Real Work done by the UEF is measurable in the lifting that& #39;s inherent in the cones& #39; instantiation.
The way that the UEF =always= & #39;moves& #39; in the direction of #Max_Ephemerance is vividly observable in 1. the way that all of the cones are
The way that the UEF =always= & #39;moves& #39; in the direction of #Max_Ephemerance is vividly observable in 1. the way that all of the cones are
constructed & #39;simultaneously& #39; - varying =solely= with respect to & #39;local c& #39;, with a subtle global geometry differential that is ordered radially-outward from the & #39;center& #39; of the cone distribution, Be-Cause, it is =exactly= coupled to the overall (& #39;local& #39;) direction of max-eph.
All of which, taken together, constitutes a Proof-of-Principle with respect to the & #39;new& #39; Reification of so-called "electricity" & "magnetism" that is explained in my blog.
=Everything= in the video is =exactly= as is explained in my blog.
HURRAH!
k. p. collins
=Everything= in the video is =exactly= as is explained in my blog.
HURRAH!
k. p. collins
I & #39;wonder& #39; - are the & #39;fluids& #39; the so-called ~"viscous quantum fluids" that were mentioned in another Tweet & #39;yesterday& #39; (Friday, 08-28-2020)?
If so, what the Universal Extreme Fluid dynamics & #39;say& #39; with respect to such is, "Ho, Ho, Ho".
And so do I
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🎅" title="Santa Claus" aria-label="Emoji: Santa Claus">.
No so-called "particles" -
If so, what the Universal Extreme Fluid dynamics & #39;say& #39; with respect to such is, "Ho, Ho, Ho".
And so do I
No so-called "particles" -
=zero= so-called "quanta" - Exist in Physical Reality.
In Physical Reality, there Exists =solely= the UEF.
The UEF instantiates and & #39;sustains& #39; =everything= & #39;else& #39; while remaining =The UEF=.
k. p. collins
In Physical Reality, there Exists =solely= the UEF.
The UEF instantiates and & #39;sustains& #39; =everything= & #39;else& #39; while remaining =The UEF=.
k. p. collins
~"I want more, please."
The & #39;cones& #39; are short-lived macroscopic & #39;atoms& #39; instantiated and & #39;contained& #39; by the #UEF until the quantity of #UEF_i_o instantiated in the reaction falls below a & #39;cone& #39;-& #39;sustainment& #39; threshold, which is what physically underpins the disintegration of the & #39;cones& #39;.
I don& #39;t know when I& #39;ll get around to doing so, but the original Tweet in this thread, by @ChemistryReacts, stimulated me to find a better way to describe the Continuity of the UEF, and I& #39;m going to update my blog, at which & #39;time& #39;, I& #39;ll Credit your Work, Sir, and Tweet again here.
