Given that the Kenosha riots are already over, can we recognize that the white male pundits screeching about urban disorder or whatever aren’t making a neutral case, but actually trying to assist Trump’s reelection campaign by building the narrative they think he needs?
There were three days of unrest in a small Wisconsin city, and the main effect of that unrest was a double murder by a Trump supporter. If your takeaway is “in recent weeks chaos has gripped America cities like it’s 1968,” you are creating a story, not observing one.
I don’t think the people doing this are even driven by a desire for Trump to win, even. They just intuitively want swings in the race - more interesting to write about - and a canvas on which to work out their pet obsessions with black protest and liberalism.
I’m an idiot, because I just now realized:

“Kenosha” is this year’s “e-mails”
Seriously, it’s the exact same thing: pundits need a quick-and-easy way to “balance out” the horse race, so they’ve all glommed on to a random object that just so happens to represent, to them, some insecurities that they themselves, as white dudes, have with the Dem candidate
They didn& #39;t care about the substance of "the email scandal" either. They just wanted someone they could fill in the blank with: "Mr. Trump has been accused by his opponents of being unqualified and racially insensitive. At the same time, Mrs. Clinton has been accused of _____."
Now, they were feeling uncomfortable with the way the campaign had become all about Trump& #39;s failings. They wanted to be able to say "But Republicans argue that Democrats will contribute to _______."

So they picked "black urban unrest" because hey, that sounds scary to them.
You can follow @whstancil.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: