Read on Twitter
I've been called various levels of irresponsible, hyperbolic, and delusional for saying that there are serious people (academics, lawyers, etc.) who believe that biological sex is simply an oppressive construct and not a scientific fact, and that this view is being mainstreamed. https://twitter.com/chasestrangio/status/1298678363360579586
I understand that this becomes a complex political issue when human rights are involved.
But we're at the point of naked science denialism for the purpose of political activism, and it's going unchallenged and even encouraged a growing segment of people who should know better.
But we're at the point of naked science denialism for the purpose of political activism, and it's going unchallenged and even encouraged a growing segment of people who should know better.
When I dunk on conservative religious fundamentalists for denying evolution and climate change, I get praise from "the party of science."
When I defend the concept of biological sex using my knowledge of evolution and anisogamy, I'm liable to be "canceled" by those same people.
When I defend the concept of biological sex using my knowledge of evolution and anisogamy, I'm liable to be "canceled" by those same people.
There's a reason why I wrote this thread: https://twitter.com/M_Methuselah/status/1298010228475211776
Paging @zaelefty, this is up your alley. This guy is apparently an ACLU lawyer.
