An anomaly ?? #Malaysia reported 3 #COVID19 cases from #TawarCluster .. sadly all 3 kids; 10y, 8y, 5y.. most likely infected by their mum, who is probably case 9128.. who in turn was infected while with case 9113, the uncle who is the index case for this cluster.. 1/n

Now why I say anomaly for #COVID19 infection.. note the day the respective cases were reported:
Case 9128 (assuming the mum) on 13th Aug.. the 3 kids on 26th Aug..
It's 13 days !! Or give and take for time for samples at the lab..
At least 11 days !! .. 2/n

So assuming the mum was positive on 13/8, she would have been, like any other #COVID19 patient be warded in hospital.. Meaning she shouldn't have much access to her kids, assuming..
Yet questions now arise.. HOW were the 3 kids infected 12 days after ?? .. 3/n

We have already seen from Wuhan.. incubation period is never the full 14 day period.. instead.. one can get infected by #SARSCoV2 within 2-14 days from studies in Mac..
Yet, we know positive #COVID19 patients can infect others even day 3 onwards.. 4/n

Hence as we survey case 9126.. reported on 13/8.. and having transmitted #COVID19 to 3 others, who were subsequently reported on 26/8.. It can only mean that somehow these 3 kids had access to case 9129 !!
If that was so.. That's NOT RIGHT !! .. 5/n

Hence, at start of this thread .. An anomaly ??

It certainly is !! For a #COVID19 patient (case 9128) to infect 3 others, kids (cases 9287, 9288, 9289).. while she was already known to be positive..

Questions only the authorities have the answer..
@DGHisham , @KKMPutrajaya