Read on Twitter
Here’s a crazy idea:
that 17 year old kid would have never been in that situation if he didn’t drive across state lines with an assault rifle with the sole intent of intimidating protestors. He put himself in that situation because he wanted to kill people.
that 17 year old kid would have never been in that situation if he didn’t drive across state lines with an assault rifle with the sole intent of intimidating protestors. He put himself in that situation because he wanted to kill people.
You dont carry a gun unless you intend to use it. So unless he planned on firing at police, he purposely put himself in a situation where he could try to claim self defense against the protestors he was brandishing the gun at and provoked in the first place.
Its CRAAAAAAAZY to me that Jacob Blake deserved 7 rounds in the back for not complying with police after he already did their job in breaking up the domestic dispute because he has a criminal background, yet this kid literally broke several laws to show up to this protest,
but the narrative is that he’s a law abiding “vigilante” (how the fuck does that even make sense) that was using “self defense”
Lets remind you that jacob blake was unarmed and got shot 7 times, this kid murdered 2 people and walked away past officers to escape.
Lets remind you that jacob blake was unarmed and got shot 7 times, this kid murdered 2 people and walked away past officers to escape.
