if i were trying to amicably coexist in a software ecosystem i would simply not publish "haha-fixed-your-broken-library-:)" crates and i certainly wouldn't write "yikes" about software i want to coexist with in documentation talking about them
it is okay and good to celebrate the ways in which software you coexist with is better than your library, in fact
if you wanted to in good faith have a discussion about a library's design and what would "fix" it, you'd at least try to explain the problem, right? tokio-fix says:
every time the word `tokio` shows up in the module's library's docs it's just linked to http://docs.rs slash tokio. it doesn't even try to be helpful. "[tokio]( http://docs.rs/tokio ) context" is infuriatingly pointed
the docs are no longer "fixes anything" :) https://github.com/stjepang/tokio-fix/commit/765b3f1754b6c49372532412c6267c29d74669e2
stjepan deleted the reddit post but i think it's important to know the framing and language he intended with this library