Read on Twitter
Objectivity isn't going to be found in cultures where a group of men voted on what's going to be considered divine cannon.
Objectivity isn't fostered in weekly echo chambers that counts the hits and never the misses.
Objectivity isn't fostered in weekly echo chambers that counts the hits and never the misses.
Objectivity is found in the process of looking, not being told what to see (faith). More accurate objectivity is achieved with multiples sources, not just stemming from one culture. It doesn't need tired apologetic arguments to stand. Objectivity can stand on its own.
I believe in being skeptical and not gullible (one man's faithfulness is another man's gullibility --- or unawareness to bias confirmation).
I now value a whole library over just one book --- especially one that's had to ebb and flow its meanings to keep up with the times.
I now value a whole library over just one book --- especially one that's had to ebb and flow its meanings to keep up with the times.
I welcome improvements that can show for themselves and agree to move with valid evidence instead of digging in and being an apologist for our cause.
I believe it's not objective to have views that have had to evolve but never stopped claiming supernatural superiority.
I believe it's not objective to have views that have had to evolve but never stopped claiming supernatural superiority.
And most importantly to me, I believe that if a group of people claimed supernatural unity and morality, it would be consistency apparent.
It isn't. It never has been. We aren't fools for leaving.
It isn't. It never has been. We aren't fools for leaving.
