Liquidity on some liquidity dependent protocol has a market anomaly, because liquid liquidity has the same value as illiquid liquidity and this is a very powerful attack vector right now. In traditional finance illiquid liquidity is more valuable than liquid liquidity.

Many protocols act like liquidity for a day is the same as liquidity for month and do not reward long term liquidity over short term liquidity. So cost the move liquidity from one protocol to another is just the gas fee. This has to change.

I see two solutions: 1. a lock-up period free to choose to immobilize this liquidity (has to be rewarded with more share of the fee) 2. Extra reward for long term provider increasing over time 3. short term liquidity provider pay long term liquidity provider on leaving

Some background
Vampire Attack: https://twitter.com/martinkrung/status/1298363320270032897?s=20
Migration mining: https://twitter.com/martinkrung/status/1297530600400859136?s=20