He says "in some parts of the world, population growth is a major driver of particular kinds of ecological damage, such as the expansion of small-scale agriculture into rainforests, the bushmeat trade and local pressure on water and land for housing." (2/n)
When people say environmental problems are caused by consumption not population, they are confusing 'environment' with 'climate', and forgetting about the nature/ecological crisis

That's dangerously oversimplistic at best. At worst, it's denial (3/n)
While tropical deforestation in SE Asia & parts of S America is driven by industrial agriculture (for rich world consumption), in much of Africa and elsewhere it is driven by smallholders growing for subsistence and local trade (5/n)
In many parts of the tropics, human populations are higher than the land can sustainably support, leading to massive degradation of ecosystems

It still might not be as big a problem for biodiversity as rich world consumption, but it should not be ignored (6/n)
Even if you don't think overpopulation is a problem, providing women in the majority world with access to education and reproductive healthcare is critically important

To dismiss overpopulation as an issue risks ignoring the unmet needs of women in the majority world (7/7)
You can follow @CharlieJGardner.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: